I'm sure no one purposefully opened fire on your frequency. NAQP contest is a
rapid-fire sprint-like contest with lots of passing/QSY's. It's also likely
that whoever started the CQ didnt hear you or the station you were working at
the time.
Olivia uses a lot of bandwidth for it's speed and
There is some Olivia MFSK activity around 7043 kc and 7073 kc. There is much
more Olivia MFSK activity around 3585 kc, 10145 kc, 14075 kc and 14100 kc.
73, GUD DX,
Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O
Lakeland, FL, USA
n...@arrl.net
NZ4O Amateur SWL Radio Autobiography: http://www.nz4o.org
Hi All,
Does anyone actually use 7.043.250 ?
All the data I can find indicates that this should be the freq to get QSO's,
but I'm yet to SEE, HEAR, or READ any signals on this freq.
The only activity I've found has been on 7.038.250 +/- PSK MFSK etc., and
using 250/8, and the very few
Who is OLIVIA?
Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa.
Real Radios Glow In The Dark
- Original Message -
From: A repeater.kee...@yahoo.co.uk
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:49 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Olivia Contacts on 40m ? ! ?
Hi All,
Does anyone
Pawel Jalocha's daughter.
Simon Brown
http://sdr-radio.com
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rotten Robbie
Who is OLIVIA?
Simon HB9DRV wrote:
Pawel Jalocha's daughter.
Simon Brown
http://sdr-radio.com
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rotten Robbie
Who is OLIVIA?
And it's the middle name of my grand-daughter. Her Mum must
Dave,
There is some Olivia activity on 7.043.250, but is sparse. Most of the
acitivity I copy is Cuban and US stations.
73
philw de ka1gmn
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:49 AM, A repeater.kee...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone actually use 7.043.250 ?
All the data I can find
Hi Bonnie,
some comments from my experience.
I have tried your proposed frequencies for Olivia and they are ok, more or
less, but:
10142.5 will have the DK0WCY beacon directly fall into the Olivia signal,
therefore I prefer the 10141.5 which is given in your plan as well but not as a
center
Hi George,
http://hflink.com/olivia
The most common flavor of Olivia is 500/16
and for DXing, you can find it on one of the
following USB VFO Dial frequencies:
7042.5 USB
7072.5 USB
10142.5 USB
14075.65 USB
14074.65 USB
14077.65 USB
18102.65 USB
When Olivia first began, the 1000/32 flavor
was
Hi Warren,
When Olivia first became somewhat popular, it
was mode of the month... there was a lot of
experimentation with tones and bandwidths.
Operators found advantages for various conditions
and needs, with extremes of each flavor.
The 2000/64 is quite good for interference
rejection.
Recently I bought a new computer and in moving all of my software to it I
seem to have lost track of my macros for Olivia in MixW. What I'm looking
for is the information to put into a macro that gives the proper signal
report format for Olivia. Any help would be appreciated.
73 GUD DX,
Tom,
I use the following macro/text for a special report during an Olivia
QSO. It is:
S/N Ratio: GET SN
Freq Offset: GET OFFSET
Sample Rate: GET RATE
73 de
Ron W4LDE
Thomas F. Giella NZ4O wrote:
Recently I bought a new computer and in moving all of my software to it I
seem to have
Howard,
Before you buy MixW, did you try Multipsk? It may be able to do what
your group wants while awaiting Fldigi fixes.
Andy
, 2009 2:48 PM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [digitalradio] Olivia - Contestia Tone /
Bandwidth Configuration
Very interesting.
What simulator are you using?
philw de ka1gmn
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote:
All,
It's interesting to see how
Patrick Lindecker wrote:
As a thumb rule:
For a same sub mode: Contestia has a double speed (+3 dB) but only 1.5
dB of loss in term of minimum S/N compared to Olivia. So it seems to be
a better compromise.
Assuming that the S/N is constant. In practice the
S/N seems to vary wildly from
Contestia and RTTYM are variants of the character set used with Olivia.
Olivia is 8-bit, Contestia is 7-bit and (I think) RTTYM is 5-bit or 6-bit.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Rik van Riel r...@surriel.com
Assuming that the S/N is constant.
(with a double set of
characters as in RTTY, so with the same problem of non-desired set of
characters switching).
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Rik van Riel r...@surriel.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia - Contestia Tone / Bandwidth
Configuration
Patrick Lindecker wrote:
As a thumb rule:
For a same sub mode: Contestia has a double speed (+3 dB) but only 1.5
dB of loss in term of minimum S/N
All,
It's interesting to see how the different Olivia mode configurations compare
when put through the HF path simulator.
I ran Contestia through the simulator this evening and these are the results.
Olivia 16/500 is shown for reference.
CONTESTIA 500Hz
Tones BandwidthChar/s
Exactly what I would have expected, nice to see that you get these results.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Tony
Hope you all find it interesting...
Tony -K2MO
Very interesting.
What simulator are you using?
philw de ka1gmn
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote:
All,
It's interesting to see how the different Olivia
mode configurations compare when put through the HF path simulator.
I ran Contestia through the
things evenly matched.
Tony -K2MO
- Original Message -
From: Phil Williams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:48 PM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [digitalradio] Olivia - Contestia Tone /
Bandwidth Configuration
Very interesting.
What simulator
All,
Interesting pathsim test: Contestia 16/500 and Olivia 4/500 move along at about
the same wpm rate, but there's quite a bit of difference in performance.
Contestia 16/500
THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG
THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS +UER THE LAZY DOG
THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 8:53 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Olivia
All,
I'm not sure why, but it seems that most of us tend to stick with the slower
versions of Olivia
even when conditions allow for much faster throughput. The more robust
tone-bandwidth
All,
I'm not sure why, but it seems that most of us tend to stick with the slower
versions of Olivia
even when conditions allow for much faster throughput. The more robust
tone-bandwidth combinations seem overkill when the path is stable so why go
slow?
I sometimes test the waters by
Would not WINMOR be an option here?
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Tony
It would be a neat to see some kind of throughput sensing where the speed
of the mode changed to suit conditions automatically.
I think that the reasons that we tend to gravitate toward a given Olivia
speed/bandwidth:
- need a standard to find others on the air. It is easy to determine
the BW, but not so easy for the number of tones.
- if you use a non-standard speed to start with, you will have a
difficult time
: [digitalradio] Olivia
I think that the reasons that we tend to gravitate toward a given Olivia
speed/bandwidth:
- need a standard to find others on the air. It is easy to determine
the BW, but not so easy for the number of tones.
- if you use a non-standard speed to start with, you
- Original Message -
From: Rick W mrf...@frontiernet. net mailto:mrf...@frontiernet.net
To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
I think that the reasons that we tend to gravitate toward
Rick
I feel you think that winmor was intended to be a chat mode.
It was not and is not nor a replacement for pactor.
John
Hi John,
WINMOR is an open protocol, therefore it is up to the developers as to
what they want to use it for. I personally prefer open protocols because
of this, but far be it for me to tell others how they can or can not use
a given protocol.
The current developers have designed the protocol
wahat happened toOlivia? I hear nobody on 14106 anymore . . .
W8ISG/Bo
B. A. Thunman
w8...@mindspring.com
EarthLink Revolves Around You.
What happened to Olivia??? I hear nobody on 14106.5 anymore . . .
B. A. Thunman
w8...@mindspring.com
EarthLink Revolves Around You.
I received a few suggestions about again sponsoring an Olivia contest. Here is
what I am suggesting.
The TARA Skirmish is scheduled Z-2400Z, Apr 19, Olivia is a permitted
mode. I suggest that you work the TARA contest AND between the hours of 0200
and 0500 and/or 1400 to 1700 you
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Olivia Activity Contest Suggestions
I have received a suggestion that this group hold another Olivia mode
contest/activity. I am interested in receiving further suggestions for this
. Since past contests that I have organized have taken up a lot of time
I have received a suggestion that this group hold another Olivia mode
contest/activity. I am interested in receiving further suggestions for this .
Since past contests that I have organized have taken up a lot of time and
have been subjected to glitches with emailed cabrillo files, I will
Graham G0NBD wrote:
Follow on from last night , As the olivia system transmits
tones in parallel it requires a linear system,
however , MFSK is a single tone phase continuous system
Hi Graham,
Olivia mode does not transmit tones in parallel.
It transmits each tone one at a time,
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
expeditionra...@... wrote:
Graham G0NBD wrote:
Follow on from last night , As the olivia system transmits
tones in parallel it requires a linear system,
however , MFSK is a single tone phase continuous system
Hi Graham,
Follow on from last night , As the olivia system transmits tones in
parallel
it requires a linear system, however , MFSK is a single tone phase
continuous system , I am using three applications of multipsk
running on
the same pc in beacon mode
8 tones are selected on the two modes
5:31 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON -
RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS
Follow on from last night , As the olivia system transmits tones in
parallel
it requires a linear system, however , MFSK is a single tone phase
continuous system , I am using three
Hi Graham
Here is a screen capture from Norway .
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Steinar Aanesland
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON
- RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS
Hi Graham
Here is a screen capture from Norway
From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 Time: 18:23:45
1700 UTC 14 Dec 2008 will be the activity hour for Olivia 500/16 on
or around 14077 USB (DIAL) . Digitalradio members are encouraged to
tune in a join QSOs. Spread out at least 500 Hz if multiple QSOs are
in progress..
1700 UTC 14 Dec 2008 will be the activity hour for Olivia 500/16 on
or around 14077 USB (DIAL) . Digitalradio members are encouraged to
tune in a join QSOs. Spread out at least 500 Hz if multiple QSOs are
in progress..
at 2000 to 2100 UTC a 30M activity hour will commence on 10135 USB ,
Olivia
, 2008 7:16:00 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Olivia mode comparisons, testers needed.
Olivia mode comparisons, testers needed.
I am interested in testing weak signal reception of Olivia 500/16 in the
following applications
Multipsk
DM780
MixW
FL-Digi
I'm looking to test the above applications
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia mode comparisons, testers needed.
list times available I try to be listening which mode 16/500 or ???
I have mixw and Dm780
Loyd C.Headrick K4LCH
K4LCH
Vol State Hosting
Olivia mode comparisons, testers needed.
I am
Article about Olivia digital mode slated for December QST magazine
Posted by: garylinnrobinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] garylinnrobinson
Date: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:33 pm ((PDT))
For anyone who may be interested there will be an article in the
December 2008 issue of QST about the Olivia digital
Just curiosity
Can anybody identify what mode is using a signal on 3.733 (80m).
I am trying to decode digital sstv on that frequency, however most of
the time I hear a clicking multitone sound like Olivia sending
beacons, maybe trying to establish a connection, it keeps
transmitting multitones
-- Forwarded message --
From: David F. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [olivia] Call CQ from VY2 Prince Edward Island
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John,
I am listening, but which Olivia mode?
(250/8, 500/16, 1000/32, 2000/64)
Sorry for the
All,
Certainly is remarkable the way Olivia mode performs under adverse conditions.
Was having trouble decoding VK2PN in PSK31 mode due to the unstable conditions
at the time (selective fading / multi-path).
Switching to Olivia 500/16 fixed the problem. Copy went from marginal to
perfect
Tony wrote:
All,
Certainly is remarkable the way Olivia mode performs under adverse
conditions.
Was having trouble decoding VK2PN in PSK31 mode due to the unstable
conditions at the time (selective fading / multi-path).
Switching to Olivia 500/16 fixed the problem. Copy went from marginal
If I am allowed to summarize, if you don't own a PTC, at least give
Olivia a try 8-)
Impressive indeed, Tony.
73,
Jose, CO2JA
---
Tony wrote:
All,
Certainly is remarkable the way Olivia mode performs under adverse
conditions.
Was having trouble decoding VK2PN in PSK31 mode due to
Of Kevin O'Rorke
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 9:13 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia mode performance
Tony wrote:
All,
Certainly is remarkable the way Olivia mode performs under adverse
conditions.
Was having trouble decoding VK2PN in PSK31 mode due
-Tony, I did work Bruce AFTER your QRP signal vacated the airways and
left an opportunity for my 50 watts. There were a few Olivia signals
on 20M last night, a couple of QSOs at once...maybe Olivia is not dead
yet.
I am well, pinched nerves and various other ailments have subsided.
Andy K3UK
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sholto Fisher
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 10:59 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
John,
I am not sure which software implements the 2 tone variety other than
the Olivia Aid
Ham Radio Deluxe/Digital Master 780 would have the 250/2 as well as many
other mode as well as even 125/2. I measured the throughput of 250/2
and it appears too slow for practical use at around only 10 wpm. Not
competitive with 45 baud RTTY at 60 wpm. I am sure it would be quite
robust
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sholto Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:37 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Olivia
Has anyone ever experimented with the 2 tone Olivia submodes?
How does say the 2/250
I am not sure which software implements the 2 tone variety other than
the Olivia Aid program?
MixW...
Tony K2MO
- Original Message -
From: Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
: [digitalradio] Olivia
Has anyone ever experimented with the 2 tone Olivia submodes?
How does say the 2/250 mode compare to regular RTTY?
73, Sholto KE7HPV.
Has anyone ever experimented with the 2 tone Olivia submodes?
How does say the 2/250 mode compare to regular RTTY?
73, Sholto KE7HPV.
It should be better, because of the Walsh code layer.
I have used it for tests among other Olivia modes, but never compared
RTTY and 2/250 Olivia. It worked fairly well, but it was just for
curiosity sake, more than anything else. It was not a serious, well
planned, exhaustive test.
73,
hello,
Happy New year to everyone!!. Anyone good with olivia an how to setup
and stuff im having some problems with the program mainly don't have a
clue what a good setup is and need someone to mentor and maybe test with
Jeff kd4qit
Ciao Claudio,
Funziono molto spesso Olivia e qui sono i modi
che normali di funzionamento ho trovato per le frequenze
differenti:
Fra 14072 e 14078 (USB), ho regolato solitamente la manopola 1407x.65
(14072.65, 14073.65, ecc), il programma di Olivia a 500/16 e la frequenza
concenta audio
Ok, gracias por tu respuesta. Intentaremos llamar CQ alrededor de las 1900 z
en 14073.65.
Ok, thanks for your answer. I will try to call CQ about 1900 z in 14073.65usb
Claudio-LU2VCD
El día 27/09/07, G. McFarlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hola Claudio,
¡Me disculpo por la respuesta
Hola Claudio,
¡Me disculpo por la respuesta Italiana!
Funciono Olivia muy a menudo y aquí soy los modos de
funcionamiento normales que he encontrado para diversas
frecuencias:
Entre 14072 y 14078 (USB), fijé generalmente el dial a 1407x.65
(14072.65, 14073.65, al etc), el programa de Olivia
Hi: i read a post about WB6REZ calling in 14074 usb. The signal was
very clear in my screen but i didnt know the setup in this frecuency.
i usually call in 14105 with 1000-32 but in 14074 with this setup i
cant read nothing.
73`s
CLAUDIO-lu2vcd
Does anyone have idea how to get a free OLIVIA software? Any URL is
appreciated.
Sincerely,
José - KP4VP
Try Fldigi, really free. No hidden MS tax.
Rein PA0R
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: 05.06.07 13:06:52
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [digitalradio] Olivia Software
Does anyone have idea how to get a free OLIVIA software
José,
Fldigi supports Olivia for Linux. If you are not a Linux user you can
also use the Puppy live CD without affecting your HD.
Darrel
On 4-Jun-07, at 6:34 PM, KP4VP wrote:
Does anyone have idea how to get a free OLIVIA software? Any URL is
appreciated.
Sincerely,
José - KP4VP
.
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Rein Couperus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia Software
Try Fldigi, really free. No hidden MS tax.
Rein PA0R
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von
Yes, good point. Also Multipsk has about 80% of functions and 100% of major
functions in a free version that does NOT expire. I think MixW expires in
30 days.
On 6/5/07, Darrel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
José,
Fldigi http://www.w1hkj.com/Fldigi.html supports Olivia for Linux. If
you
: [digitalradio] Olivia Software
Date:Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:06:46 +
Does anyone have idea how to get a free OLIVIA software? Any URL is
appreciated.
Sincerely,
José - KP4VP
Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php
Yahoo
Rick,
I have had amazing results on 80M with Olivia 500/16. With QRN crashes
to 10 over nine, I was got near perfect print from a station in Florida
that normally would run at S 7. True, the speed is a bit slow but a
greater speed is provided with Contestia which I have used but have not
Hey Patricia,
I'm over in Texas. Will give it a try if you are still on.
Phil De KA1GMN
Patricia (Elaine) Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm operating Olivia mode on 30 meters at the moment (0308GMT) ...
If anyone cares to make a QSO, I'd like to run
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Phil Williams
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 8:53 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia on 10140.5 -- Sunday Evening April 8th:
Hey Patricia,
I'm over in Texas. Will give it a try if you
I'm operating Olivia mode on 30 meters at the moment (0308GMT) ...
If anyone cares to make a QSO, I'd like to run Olivia for a while ..
Am using 500 Hz bandwidth / 8 tones ..
Channel center = 10140.5 KHz
Elaine
--
Patricia (Elaine) Gibbons / WA6UBE
I just had a nice QSO with Bo W8ISG today.
We first linked on standard ALE but the propagation was rapidly decaying.
Before we lost contact on ALE, I sent a simple ALE AMD text message
GO TO OLIVIA.
We changed to Olivia 1000/32 and made good contact, but eventually,
that dropped to about 75%
I like to use the narrowest possible bandwidth mode possible, but
sometimes conditions are so bad, and there are unlikely to be many other
stations that going to a wide bandwidth 1000 or even 2000 Hz mode I
think it can be justified.
So far, the consensus seems to be that Olivia will beat all
Rick KV9U wrote:
Well, tonight my experimenter friend and I got taken out by QRN when
it came to digital modes. We started on MFSK16 and then tried to
go to the ALE 141A mode and no luck with that or FAE.
Hi Rick,
I'm surprised you didn't try one of the Olivia flavors.
Olivia 500/16
1000/32 would blow all the QRN away, methinks
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 11:04 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] OLIVIA Re: Best mode for severe QRN?
Rick KV9U wrote:
Well, tonight
1000/32 would blow all the QRN away, methinks
John
VE5MU
Hi John,
Yes, I agree, Olivia 1000/32 is excellent, it decodes at -13dB SNR.
Olivia 500/16 is about 1dB better than 1000/32.
Olivia 250/8 is about 2dB better than 1000/32.
Here is a chart (courtesy of Patrick F6CTE)
Okay, I have downloaded and installed MultiPSK and am ready to try this
new mode out. What are the best frequencies and times to listen for
Olivia signals? Also, I understand there are variations in the mode -
what do I operate and where?
After several years, the main digital mode still appears to be PSK31,
especially on the higher bands. When a new mode comes out, some of us
will test it and if it doesn't have some superior feature, may not use
it that much. A good example is MT-63 which seemed fairly popular when
it first
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
I received a Skype call from a ham asking me the very same question I
was thinking last week...what has happened to Olivia? Last year I
would say it was behind only PSK31, Pactor and RTTY in terms of
frequent actvity for digital modes. Now I think it is not as
Is there any reason we couldn't have images with Olivia? As far as I
can tell, MFSK images are just plain old SSTV images with a header
specifying size sent in MFSK data. The offset needs to be set for the
different Olivia widths, but that is about it. Am I confused?
Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Sat, 24
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia dying?
Is there any reason we couldn't have images with Olivia? As far as I
can tell, MFSK images are just plain old SSTV images with a header
specifying size sent in MFSK data. The offset needs to be set for the
different Olivia widths
Well, I plain have not attempted it.
In spite of my ignorance, it might work.
Will look into it later.
Jose, CO2JA
Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:
Is there any reason we couldn't have images with Olivia? As far as I
can tell, MFSK images are just plain old SSTV images with a header
specifying
- Original Message -
From: Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia dying?
Is there any reason we couldn't have images with Olivia? As far as I
can tell, MFSK images are just plain old SSTV images
compressed digital SSTV.
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia dying?
Patrick,
My understanding is that the modulation for the image
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
I received a Skype call from a ham asking me the very same question I
was thinking last week...what has happened to Olivia? Last year I
would say it was behind only PSK31, Pactor and RTTY in terms of
frequent actvity for digital modes. Now I think it is not as
Anyone availble for olivia tonight at 9PM EST? on 40 meter
sensitivity.
This would answer lots of questions concerning which mode was best.
Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:28 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Olivia 500 Re: Best Mode
Eli k0Eli wrote:
If you could use only one mode QRP what would be best?
Not factoring in popularity, for the sake of argument
assume that everyone is going to use that mode too.
Hi Eli,
I also assume you mean normal HF realtime QRP QSOs?
A year ago, I would have said CW.
But Olivia
Wonderfull! After more than a year off radio, just
scanning the 21MHz band, and amazed on seeing and hearing a strange signal at
this hour on this band, by trial and error I was able to have a good and very
well readable QSO with Arkady, RN6A locator KN95KA at 17:48 UTC.
I was just trying
Hi Jerry,
Olivia 500/8 is not used as much for CQ as Olivia 500/16 and Olivia
1000/32 are. When using Olivia it helps to be exactly on one of the
calling or working frequencies, otherwise your signal may blend into
the background. For more info Check the website:
http://hflink.com/olivia
73
Would you please drop the first amendment rhetoric? It's totally
irrelevent here.
Thanks,
Paul / K9PS
Thomas Giella KN4LF wrote:
There is a second Olivia Yahoo eGroup at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/olivia_mfsk .There is no heavy handed
moderator control in this eGroup, as the 1st
I think we need to get away from the idea that different modes can not
coexist (within reason). Consider that many are promoting a change by
the FCC to base the occupancy by bandwidth, rather than mode. At the
very least, you would expect the digital ops to be able to do this.
Typically, I
Alan NV8A wrote
I copied several CQ messages in PAX2 from EA2AFR on 14075...
...looked like 9 separate frequencies on the waterfall,
but I could not find a mode in MultiPSK that suited.
What modes are being transmitted here or have been over
the last half an hour or so?
Hi Alan,
It may
Bonnie,
From my frequent monitoring, I would have to say that the only really
popular mode is PSK31. It is not uncommon now to have more PSK31 signals
within a 2.3 KHz passband, than even cw signals during a contest. Like
this weekend you might find 4 to 6 cw signals but you would find up to
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia 500/8 Center-of-Activity
14076kHz-14079kHz proposed
Bonnie,
From my frequent monitoring, I would have to say that the only really
popular mode is PSK31. It is not uncommon now to have more PSK31 signals
within a 2.3 KHz
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
