Two areas where there is a need for digital comms:
1) Satellite / deep space
2) Boat owners far away without internet (let's ditch PACTOR please)
Hello, Simon!
I would add people with antenna and power restrictions such as myself in the
categories of needing digital modes. I have dipole
- Original Message -
From: Christian Crayton n5...@yahoo.com
1) Satellite / deep space
2) Boat owners far away without internet (let's ditch PACTOR please)
Hello, Simon!
I would add people with antenna and power restrictions such as myself in
the categories of needing digital
Good points, Dave,
Considering that RTTY, the oldest digital mode (not counting morse code
which goes back to spark), is still one of the most common modes, and
PSK31 is the most common of the newer modes, it appears that there is
only a small interest in any new digital technology. When I
Rick and Dave,
NBEMS was created and submitted at the eleventh hour as a reply to Rinaldo's
search for an HF protocol, but instead as a VHF system, mainly for emcomm. We
afterwards expanded it to include HF messaging for extended range where VHF
does not work, but is still primarily a digital
Two areas where there is a need for digital comms:
1) Satellite / deep space
2) Boat owners far away without internet (let's ditch PACTOR please)
I'm indirectly involved with 1) and am following the WINMOR project which looks
very interesting. Here in central Europe there's not a huge need for
let's ditch PACTOR please -no
la5vna Steinar
Simon (HB9DRV) wrote:
Two areas where there is a need for digital comms:
1) Satellite / deep space
2) Boat owners far away without internet (let's ditch PACTOR please)
I'm indirectly involved with 1) and am following the WINMOR project
of arrogance
among those mailbox users!
73, Skip KH6TY
http://kh6ty.home.comcast.net
- Original Message -
From: Steinar Aanesland
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE digital activity
let's ditch PACTOR
I am not necessarily opposed to other hams using Pactor modes, but the
one issue that is consistently ignored seems to be the transmission of
fax/image data when using the wide bandwidth modes. If kept at 500 Hz or
less, the changes in the rules a few years back finally allows fax/image
to
Steinar,
I think the 'request' may be based round 'access for all' and not the
banishment of the mode ..
In a abstract way, this seems to fit the bill :)
The time has come, the Walrus said,
To talk of many things:
Of shoes--and ships--and sealing-wax--
Of cabbages--and kings--
Oh thank the Gods, Here I was thinking that you was one of the
anti wide - anti hardware type guys,
At 04:07 PM 3/5/2009, you wrote:
I am not necessarily opposed to other hams using Pactor modes, but the
one issue that is consistently ignored seems to be the transmission of
fax/image data
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick W mrf...@... wrote:
Considering that RTTY, the oldest digital mode (not counting morse code which
goes back to spark), is still one of the most common modes, and PSK31 is the
most common of the newer modes, it appears that there is
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
Again, this would substantiate Dave AA6YQ's statement a year or so ago, that
almost all digital mode users on HF are PSK and RTTY active, and that other
digital are so under utilized that their presence
12 matches
Mail list logo
