OK John
You have had your say NOW MINE.
ONE LAST TIME .
I just sent out in MAY 2007 110 QSL cards all worked
on ssb between 50.110 and 50.350 and at 50.400 was a
group of AM boys. this time I had to pass on
working them. 6 IS used if you want a dead band
you need to save 10
Careful with the free version...
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/05/microsoft_mvp_threats/
Leigh/WA5ZNU
For free software from Microsoft there is -
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/
I have written a lot of software using the free versions, I have now
purchased the full version.
Whats wrong with it?
Spam problems ?
--- Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Careful with the free version...
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/05/microsoft_mvp_threats/
Leigh/WA5ZNU
Bored
Bruce, the center frequency of my skeleton-slot design is 144.2 MHz, as it is
specifically intended for SSB operation. The Jaybeam was a commercial
implementation of the skeleton-slot which it used as a driver with rows of
reflectors and directors aligned with the top and bottom driven
--- Skip Teller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce, the center frequency of my skeleton-slot
design is 144.2 MHz, as it is specifically intended
for SSB operation.
INTERESTING I could not remember the name it's
been too long but the antenna worked as good as
stacked 7 elm cushcrafts back
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
--- Skip Teller [EMAIL PROTECTED
-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
--- Skip Teller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce, the center frequency of my skeleton-slot
design is 144.2 MHz
NO you better get real 1% of all hams do not need 90%
of a band ANY BAND .
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
You better work on your math, Bruce!
A 100 kHz channel in 4 MHz is only 2.5%
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date
John Champa wrote:
Bruce,
When are you ever going to stop your babling ignorance about wide
band HSMM on 6-meters?
You are worried about 100 kHz when the band maybe opens in a few
years out of a 4,000 kHz wide band. Get real! Attach brain to
keyboard.
I am getting very tired of
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 08:54:36 -0700
John Champa wrote:
Bruce,
When are you ever going to stop your babling ignorance about wide
band HSMM on 6-meters?
You are worried about 100 kHz when
mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on
New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
NO you better get real 1% of all hams do not need
90%
of a band ANY
Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 09:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
59.3 to 54.000 is 90% and if it was used by 17
stations
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
--- Skip Teller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce, the center frequency of my skeleton-slot
design is 144.2 MHz, as it is specifically intended
for SSB
Bruce,
You are just one big lovable DINOSAUR.
Vy 73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun
@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:39:43 -0500
John,
It is you who are the offensive one. And you have done this a number of
times on this group. Reasonable people do not win friends and influence
John,
Look at your continued choice of language! You just do not have a clue
about leadership or you would never talk like that. You are
intentionally polarizing and increase, rather than decrease opposition
to what you think you are promoting.
Be careful when you start to make claims of what
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless you have had the opportunity to lead such an effort, it
is you who should knock it off.
That's wrong, John. A leader must not only accept, but actively
solicit critique from everywhere, not
Original Message Follows
From: Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:00:39 -
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio
From: Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:32:22 -0500
John,
Look at your continued choice of language! You just do not have a clue
about
OK John
You have had your say NOW MINE no rebuttals please..
ONE LAST TIME .
1st when did I EVER state I was a lawyer? As for ill
informed how may receive stations did your 24/7/365
experiment use to show the lack of interference from
your proposed mode ?
ANSWER ONLY ONE and he was
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:00:39 -
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa k8ocl@ wrote:
Unless
Don't know about anyone else, but I am tired of reading the messages
between some here, and the bs that is passing back and forth.
If you guys want to have a pissing contest, then why not do it with
emails to each other, or take it to another forum.
Kurt
K8YZK
Kurt wrote:
Don't know about anyone else, but I am tired of reading the messages
between some here, and the bs that is passing back and forth.
If you guys want to have a pissing contest, then why not do it with
emails to each other, or take it to another forum.
Kurt
K8YZK
Yes
First, let me say thanks to all who were interested enough in the protocol
issue to offer suggestions
Usable on SSB ... ?? I have worked New York state from tampabay on USB
with stacked ku4ab squailos.
I am not sure I understand Bruce's puzzlement. The subject antenna is derived
I was wondering what the center frequency was and the
band width THAT'S WHY I ASKED IF IT WAS USABLE ON SSB.
I had 7 over 7 skeleton-slot beams made in England in
the late 1960 and I'm WELL aware of that array.
As for BIG WHEELS had them too a stacked pair and have
given thought to building
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Howard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also a significant improvement in using horizontal
polarization compared to vertical polarization (RCA established this
years ago for TV and that is why TV signals are horizontally
polarized).
Good
Rick,
We have four parallel efforts right now. One is to adapt PSKmail for better TTY
operation as opposed to mailbox operations, another is to embed ARQ in fldigi,
another is to rewrite FMpsk to improve decoding and orient it more toward
decentralized Emcomm communications, and lastly, to
--- Skip KH6TY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There will be a QST constructions article in coming
months for a horizontally- polarized 2m antenna that
equals the performance of a 5-element beam,
Usable on SSB ... ??
I have worked New York state from tampabay on USB
with stacked ku4ab squailos.
Skip, we applaud your efforts and are happy to see the cross platform
work.
Please consider RealBasic as a tool instead of VB.net. With MS there
is no such thing as 'free' or 'cross platform. With RealBasic you can
code cross platform and there is no charge for the Linux version.
Either way, we
- Original Message -
From: Howard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please consider RealBasic as a tool instead of VB.net. With MS there
is no such thing as 'free' or 'cross platform.
For free software from Microsoft there is -
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/
I have written a lot
On 6/1/07, Howard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please consider RealBasic as a tool instead of VB.net. With MS there
is no such thing as 'free' or 'cross platform. With RealBasic you can
code cross platform and there is no charge for the Linux version.
Howard,
Actually, with the .NET
:34 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
- Original Message -
From: Howard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please consider RealBasic as a tool instead of VB.net. With MS there
is no such thing as 'free' or 'cross platform
] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
On 6/1/07, Howard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please consider RealBasic as a tool instead of VB.net. With MS there
is no such thing as 'free' or 'cross platform. With RealBasic you can
code cross platform
Skip,
Sounds really interesting. Isn't much of this is available right now
with Linux, on PSKmail? However it is not available on MS Windows OS
which is what 95+% of hams use worldwide for now. It would seem that
adoption will be low until we have cross platform capability.
My experience
Andy wrote:
I like the last proposal.
Did HFLINK get any response from the ARRL ?
Hi Andy,
It may take time for ARRL to digest the HFLINK comment document.
It runs about 13 pages with all the tables and attachments.
Has anyone seen any comments from other hams or organizations yet?
Has anyone seen any comments from other hams or organizations yet?
Bonnie KQ6XA
Yes, I immediately received comments from two officials at ARRL! Paul Rinaldo's
was:
To: Skip Teller ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Howard Teller ; Dennis Bodson
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: New HF
37 matches
Mail list logo
