w6ids wrote:
snip
I'm sorry, but I have never understood WHY the mode got dropped just
because PSK came alive. I see no reason why it can't be as fun to
use as legacy RTTY. I'm probably odd man out but frankly, after
some trial and error testing, I have little interest in MT63, Olivia,
At 01:20 PM 12/31/2007, you wrote:
I might be wrong but I think that MixW can parse Pactor1 FEC.
de Roger W6VZV
Why even try?
You have stated a number of times pactor is dead !
At 08:34 PM 1/1/2008, you wrote:
John, you might ask yourself if your above comment is worthy of your
personal level of maturity.
Roger please, I'm not the one that can't fine a pactor QSO.
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
At 08:34 PM 1/1/2008, you wrote:
John, you might ask yourself if your above comment is worthy of
your personal level of maturity.
Roger please, I'm not the one that can't fine a pactor QSO.
Yes, John, a terrible moral failing, I know... 8-)
Elaine and I had some attempts to work each other the past few days as I
heard her on the bands but we were always quite weak to each other. If
we had been using Pactor modems, especially those from non SCS
manufacturers, I doubt that we would have had any luck connecting.
We did have a small
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD For KBD - KBD?
Elaine and I had some attempts to work each other the past few days as I
heard her on the bands but we were always quite weak to each other. If
we had been using Pactor modems, especially those from non SCS
CQing on 14.0755 Pactor ARQ FWIW... de Nick KU2A FN42dw
- Original Message -
From: Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD For KBD - KBD?
Elaine and I had some attempts to work each other the past few days as I
heard her
Nick wrote:
CQing on 14.0755 Pactor ARQ FWIW... de Nick KU2A FN42dw
How does one CQ in Pactor ARQ?
de Roger W6VZV
You don't, you would use either Pactor-1 FEC or RTTY to call CQ first.
73 Sholto
KE7HPV.
- Original Message -
From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD
: w6ids [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD For KBD - KBD?
- Original Message -
From: Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 31
Sholto Fisher wrote:
You don't, you would use either Pactor-1 FEC or RTTY to call CQ
first.
Yes, I know. That was my point. I haven't heard a Pactor FEC signal in
3 or 4 years.
de Roger W6VZV
: Monday, December 31, 2007 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD For KBD - KBD?
Sholto Fisher wrote:
You don't, you would use either Pactor-1 FEC or RTTY to call CQ
first.
Yes, I know. That was my point. I haven't heard a Pactor FEC signal in
3 or 4 years
Sholto Fisher wrote:
You know I head a Pactor-1 FEC call around 14,061 a couple days ago
but I don't have my PK-232 anymore so couldn't reply. I wonder if it
was someone in this group?
73 Sholto KE7HPV.
I might be wrong but I think that MixW can parse Pactor1 FEC.
de Roger W6VZV
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CQing on 14.0755 Pactor ARQ FWIW... de Nick KU2A FN42dw
Hi Nick,
I can be QRV tomorrow (1/1/08) between 14 and 16 UTC on that frequency
if you wish. The MUF will be around 16-17 MHZ during these times so we
should be OK.
Is
- Original Message -
From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 2:28 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD For KBD - KBD?
I was active on the TNC modes, i.e. Amtor, Pactor, RTTY for a lot
Howard,
I've read where the thinking is that most hams won't bother with the
PACTOR I if only because of little desire to buy an expensive outboard
TNC. What about the hams who never threw away their original TNC,
the one sitting in the closet per se?
I've often wondered the same thing.
OK congrats on the technicality but my point was looking for ARQ
response. If someone replies FEC with a soundcard I'll answer.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick wrote:
CQing on 14.0755 Pactor ARQ FWIW... de Nick KU2A FN42dw
How does
Hi Demetre
That would be 14.0755 center freq AFSK. I am terrible with schedules
due to commitments but will try to call CQ at times between 14 and 16z
on 1/1/08. My 20m antenna at present is a G5RV and there is a hill in
the direction of EU. We are in this QTH for another 3 months then
will be
At 05:28 PM 31/12/2007,Roger wrote:
I was active on the TNC modes, i.e. Amtor, Pactor, RTTY for a lot of
years, roughly 1989-2003 or so. Pactor was quite popular until the
early 2000s, when PSK31 was introduced by Peter Martinez. This ushered
in an age of narrow-frequency soundcard modes, which
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jack Chomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still use a TNC for PSK31, IF I want to run a minimalist station,
without a laptop ;-)
The SCS PTC-IIex has PSK31 built in that allows me to use a hand held
battery powered dumb terminal on it, or my Psion 3MX
Yes for receive. Also, MultiPSK can also receive and transmit Pactor I
FEC.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Roger J. Buffington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sholto Fisher wrote:
You know I head a Pactor-1 FEC call around 14,061 a couple days ago
but I don't have my
- Original Message -
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 12:56 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD For KBD - KBD?
Hello Howard,
I use Pactor I every now and then for keyboard to keyboard
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of w6ids
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 9:58 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD For KBD - KBD?
- Original Message -
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL
w6ids wrote:
- Original Message - From: Bill McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:bmc%40wonderwave.net To:
digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, December 30,
2007 12:56 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Is PACTOR I Actually DEAD
For KBD
Hello Howard,
I use Pactor I every now and then for keyboard to keyboard. It is hit
and miss for me; more a novelty than an oft-used mode.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, w6ids [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have been recent comments attesting to the demise of
PACTOR I.
26 matches
Mail list logo
