I am coming late to this topic, how is this different from regular packet ?
Andy K3UK
On 2/7/09, Rick W mrf...@frontiernet.net wrote:
Yes Maiko,
I expect to be around most of the day tomorrow. 14.109 is sometimes a
bit busy but we can use that as a baseline.
Was not familiar with that
Instead of using the 2FSK300 mode of conventional packet, they use a
substitute 15 tone QPSK running at ~83 baud with 125 Hz separation of
tones.
Packet has a lot of value in terms of the framework that I often
mention, but the modulation is often extremely difficult for HF and this
has been
Any settings suggestions, using MiXW?
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rick W
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 9:09 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Ready for Q15X25 packet test ...
Yes
The previously mentioned web site should be a good one for set up:
http://www.wattystuff.net/amateur/packet/q15x25setup.htm
73,
Rick, KV9U
John Bradley wrote:
Any settings suggestions, using MiXW?
John
VE5MU
Hi Rick,
Okay, getting somewhere (finally). Just need to get my HF rig
out of *storage* and hook it up to an antenna. All I have right
now is 20 meters, nothing else (sorry). We'll have to try this
during the day then - tommorrow sometime if possible ?
I setup another test box, running Slackware
Yes Maiko,
I expect to be around most of the day tomorrow. 14.109 is sometimes a
bit busy but we can use that as a baseline.
Was not familiar with that web site, so will tweak according to their
recommendations. I did make some changes I see from another source and
it concurs close to some of
