KH6TY wrote:
Alan, though we may disagree as to the amount or nature of FHSS in ROS,
Actually, I think we agree, just for different reasons. I really don't
care about ROS. But do care about dangerous precedents. :-)
the bottom line is that the FCC engineers, as well as the ARRL
engineers,
Alan, please carry on the debate with someone else. I have spent a huge
amount of time on this issue, trying to help in whatever way I can,
although I do not have all the answers, obviously. I need to do
something other than sit in front of this computer all day!
Have fun,
73 - Skip KH6TY
