IMNSHO malicious interference, interference that prevents or
interrupts a QSO on a frequency from any source is ILLEGAL by the
existing rules. The fact that this rule is not being enforced should
generate information to the FCC on these interferences and requests
to the same agency to clean
.
What's your grid square?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Demetre SV1UY
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 5:42 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Questions on digital
At 04:23 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote:
Again in MO, any station operating unattended and generating RF interfering
signals should NEVER be allowed on Amateur frequencies.
It's not ! under FCC rules
At 04:37 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote:
Unless you're willing to purchase an SCS TNC, you will not be able
to know who or what QRM'd you. A requirement that all unattended
stations identify in CW at least once within each 5-minute period of
activity would eliminate this problem.
Dave I'm not to
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 8:26 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Questions on digital opposition, QRM on PACTOR
PMBOS now from DAVE, Congrats
I have never heard a WinLink PMBO identify in CW.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Dave Bernstein wrote:
I have never heard a WinLink PMBO identify in CW.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
That is because they never do. The SCS TNCs can be set to ID in CW, but
in practice no one ever does.
de Roger W6VZV
Struebel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 7:36:45 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Questions on digital opposition, QRM on PACTOR
PMBOS now from DAVE, Congrats
Listen to mineIt IDs in CW
at the end
At 07:26 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote:
I have never heard a WinLink PMBO identify in CW.
Like I said Dave my winlink station does it all the time.
Either in P1 or CW.
Now if I'm in a KB2KB QSO it will not I will force the SCS
modem to do it. But under computer control it will.
It's in use right
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
What about the Radio Hams that do not have the luxury of 100 meg
Internet that YOU ENJOY, or don't even have a 56k dial-up connection?
What about the ones who travel the world in a boat, in an RV, the ones
that are on holiday away from home? What about the ones who travel
- Original Message -
From: Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 4:56 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Questions on digital opposition
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently deployed
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
Sometimes through the night
when I cannot access any European PACTOR PMBOS because I do not have a
decent 80 meters antenna, I can connect to PMBOs in Canada or USA on
30 or 40 meters. How about that?
If it uses more than 500 hertz bandwidth it is not something I want on
Demetre SV1UY wrote:
First of all not many can afford a satellite phone, which is also not
amateur radio. A satellite phone plus connection fees are far more
expensive than a PACTOR MODEM. Second many do not even have the luxury
of a UHF link, nor are they near a town, so HF is playing a
12 matches
Mail list logo
