On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Tom Rondeau t...@trondeau.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Jim Larsen n7ihq@gmail.com wrote:
The CPU usage of the QT GUI Frequency Sink is much higher than the QT GUI
Sink. I made a test flow graph with a noise source, throttle, and QT GUI
Sink
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Jim Larsen n7ihq@gmail.com wrote:
The CPU usage of the QT GUI Frequency Sink is much higher than the QT GUI
Sink. I made a test flow graph with a noise source, throttle, and QT GUI
Sink using default parameters. I am running GNU Radio version 3.7.0, Xubuntu
The CPU usage of the QT GUI Frequency Sink is much higher than the QT GUI
Sink. I made a test flow graph with a noise source, throttle, and QT GUI
Sink using default parameters. I am running GNU Radio version 3.7.0, Xubuntu
13.10, on a MacBook with 2.4 Ghz Intel dual core CPU.
QT GUI Frequency