Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver

Ron, Thankk you for your answer. I have 2 USRP1s now and both loads the firmware correctly, but one refuses to work with ANY "SDR App". I post a separate thread for that. Thanks! On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Ron Economos wrote: > You should be able to replace the

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver

Hi folks, I've just spent a couple days reading a lot in here. Finding this thread, a recent one, talking ham radio gives me an excellent opportunity to join in - my first post here. I'm in the process of putting together receive & transmit capability based on gnuradio. Not a transceiver

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver

Hi everybody, On 08.11.2015 11:15, Markus Heller wrote: > This is the reason why also in the future there will be > many GNURadio developers who will consider to get a license I surely am in that group, especially since HAMRADIO '15. So, I really love this discussion going on here. GNU Radio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver

Here's a link to a project. http://sodaradio.sourceforge.net/Site/SoDaRadio.html Also, one of the folks on #bladerf has developed a big ham radio orientated GRC flow graph. http://www.unm.edu/~goatman/RadioPresidio.grc Ron W6RZ On 11/07/2015 01:13 PM, Mike Willis wrote: GQRX works very

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver

Hi, I see quite a lot of activity. Last FOSDEM brought me the insight that about 70% of all participants in the GNURadio section hold a callsign. When I asked the audience who had a callsign, I also initially expected just a couple of hands up, but the result was overwhelming. I guess the

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver

Ron, Thank you for the info, but does anyone know how to modify the Radio.Presidio.grc file to work with the USRP1 ? That's all I have available to me : Here's a link to a project. http://sodaradio.sourceforge.net/Site/SoDaRadio.html Also, one of the folks on #bladerf has developed a big ham

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver

-bounces+steve.greenland=clyde-space@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Mike Willis Sent: 07 November, 2015 9:14 PM To: GNURadio Discussion List <discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver GQRX works very well but is there or might there be any plans to develop a compreh

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver

Thanks all - Ron that was just what I was looking for - and to Markus, you don't make a transmitter because you want one, you do it because you can. Not having antennas is hardly a handicap. You can still build a system with lots of power to warm a dummy load, because it's fun to do that. Mike

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver

You should be able to replace the osmocom Sink and Source blocks with UHD sink and source blocks. Alternatively, you can compile the osmocom blocks with UHD support. Then you just have to change the "Device Arguments" string to remove the bladeRF specific arguments (probably just leave it

[Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver

GQRX works very well but is there or might there be any plans to develop a comprehensive tranceiver based on gnuradio? SDRs like the hackRF and the Ettus USRPs provide great building blocks for a VHF/UHF amateur radio station, with only filtering and amplification needed to cover all bands from

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver

On 11/07/2015 04:13 PM, Mike Willis wrote: GQRX works very well but is there or might there be any plans to develop a comprehensive tranceiver based on gnuradio? SDRs like the hackRF and the Ettus USRPs provide great building blocks for a VHF/UHF amateur radio station, with only filtering and

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] SSB/CW/FM tranceiver

On Nov 7, 2015, at 13:13, Mike Willis wrote: > GQRX works very well but is there or might there be any plans to > develop a comprehensive tranceiver based on gnuradio? > > SDRs like the hackRF and the Ettus USRPs provide great building blocks > for a VHF/UHF amateur radio