Re: GitHub Actions

@Florian, dependent builds or build stages are possible, seealso:  https://github.com/codingjoe/django/commit/eeefc83a85ba5e91b98c4e29fb9b20896612cc8c/checks?check_suite_id=299641652 -- Johannes Hoppe www.johanneshoppe.com Want to chat? Let's get a coffee! https://calendly.com/codingjoe/call

Re: GitHub Actions

Wow, the response has been much bigger than expected. That's great, it's good to know that this is a topic people are invested in. It shows me two things: 1. There is a certain degree of dissatisfaction about the current setup. 2. There is enough interest to support a more community driven

Re: GitHub Actions

Maybe this discussion is slightly off topic, and at the risk of derailing things I’d like to put out my view on this. There is more to it than just “using Github’s computing power”, just as there is more to using AWS than “using Amazon’s computing power”. That’s only a small part of it: it’s

Re: GitHub Actions

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 3:51 AM Carlton Gibson wrote: > Hey Shai. > > On Wednesday, 6 November 2019 08:43:21 UTC+1, Shai Berger wrote: >> >> >> Is there benefit enough in GitHub Actions (over Jenkins) to justify a >> move from an open-source based solution? >> > > I don't think we have to move

Re: GitHub Actions

On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 at 4:48:11 PM UTC+1, Tom Forbes wrote: > > The usage limits are documented here: > https://help.github.com/en/github/automating-your-workflow-with-github-actions/about-github-actions#usage-limits. > > I’m not sure how they apply to organisations (maybe just

Re: GitHub Actions

Here it is: https://github.com/orf/django-github-actions/tree/master/.github/workflows There are two actions I’ve added here: a lint step and a matrix of sqlite tests (Windows, MacOS and Ubuntu * py36 and py37). It’s

Re: GitHub Actions

Yes there will be. Now Github has added caching I think we are good to go. I will send a link here with the longer running on my fork and we can look at starting there. Once (if?) that’s merged then we can enable the “allow forks to run actions” option and we can iteratively add more tests as

Re: GitHub Actions

Right, but there has to be some changes done i think. On Wed 6 Nov, 2019, 6:05 PM Florian Apolloner, wrote: > > > On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 at 8:43:21 AM UTC+1, Shai Berger wrote: >> >> Is there benefit enough in GitHub Actions (over Jenkins) to justify a >> move from an open-source based

Re: GitHub Actions

Can we use pythongui library for that and then use selenium for testing . On Wed 6 Nov, 2019, 2:21 PM Carlton Gibson, wrote: > Hey Shai. > > On Wednesday, 6 November 2019 08:43:21 UTC+1, Shai Berger wrote: >> >> >> Is there benefit enough in GitHub Actions (over Jenkins) to justify a >> move

Re: GitHub Actions

On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 at 8:43:21 AM UTC+1, Shai Berger wrote: > > Is there benefit enough in GitHub Actions (over Jenkins) to justify a > move from an open-source based solution? > Yes, less server costs (even if sponsored). Less things to maintain for us (Jenkins is a beast).

Re: GitHub Actions

Hey Shai. On Wednesday, 6 November 2019 08:43:21 UTC+1, Shai Berger wrote: > > > Is there benefit enough in GitHub Actions (over Jenkins) to justify a > move from an open-source based solution? > I don't think we have to move away entirely but it would be good to bring in something else...