I am interested in understanding what is the current consensus for the key changes in DMARCbis. Anxious to begin exploratory coding, I am personally focused on integration algorithms to apply dynamically processed results for SPF, DMARC,Alignment and the “relaxer” auth= tag.
spf=pass spf=hardfail spf=softfail spf=neutral spf=unknown dmarc=Pass dmarc=Reject dmarc=Quarantine dmarc=None alignment=pass alignment=fail auth=spf auth=dkim auth=spf,dkim With no judgement. Of course, the issue has been there are too many false negatives with p=reject and p=quarantine applications. Are we considering results for ARC? I don’t know the ARC state conditions to state here, but I presume it provides a "trusted” or “self-signed” solution to correct broken 1st party signatures? I would also like to see an updated DMARCBis protocol lookup procedure or algorithm when considering the proposed optional process parameter “auth=“ value. An updated draft would be the ideal for the most current consensus. Thanks — HLS _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
