Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5322.From Header Rewrite specification

It appears that Todd Herr said: >RFC 7960 isn't a specification for rewriting 5322.From per se, but section >4.1.3.1 discusses the topic of rewriting that header, including this text: > > Another option for ReSenders is to rewrite the RFC5322 >.From

Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5322.From Header Rewrite specification

On March 31, 2023 6:50:22 PM UTC, Todd Herr wrote: >On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 2:32 PM Hector Santos 40isdg@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> Is there a specification for rewriting the 5322.From to help resolve DMARC >> p=reject redistribution problems? >> > >RFC 7960 isn't a specification for

Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5322.From Header Rewrite specification

On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 2:32 PM Hector Santos wrote: > Is there a specification for rewriting the 5322.From to help resolve DMARC > p=reject redistribution problems? > RFC 7960 isn't a specification for rewriting 5322.From per se, but section 4.1.3.1 discusses the topic of rewriting that

[dmarc-ietf] 5322.From Header Rewrite specification

Is there a specification for rewriting the 5322.From to help resolve DMARC p=reject redistribution problems? What is the logic the IETF.ORG list using? Thanks in advance — HLS___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org