Re: [dmarc-ietf] DSAP "DKIM Sender Authorization Protocol" for DMARC

2023-04-19 Thread Douglas Foster
Hector, does your proposal allow for constrained delegation? I think we have a problem if this type of third-party signing allows any account at the list domain to impersonate any account in any participating domain. DF On Sat, Apr 8, 2023, 2:01 PM Hector Santos wrote: > Summary: > > I would

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DSAP "DKIM Sender Authorization Protocol" for DMARC

2023-04-10 Thread Douglas Foster
Hector, here is my take on the DSAP proposal. I am not sold. DSAP notable features 1) DSAP policy can be used to identify and block non-mail subdomains of registered domains. This might be useful when mail-sending domains use p=(none|quarantine). The equivalent result can achieved with DMARC

[dmarc-ietf] DSAP "DKIM Sender Authorization Protocol" for DMARC

2023-04-08 Thread Hector Santos
Summary: I would like to reintroduce the DSAP (DKIM Sender Authorization Protocol) as a DMARC extended tag extension -dsap. The original DSAP draft covered nine 1st vs 3rd party signature policies from a verifier viewpoint, which addressed boundary conditions for DKIM signatures. The