Re: [dmarc-discuss] amazon.de fail

2015-06-16 Thread John Levine via dmarc-discuss
In article 20150616080608.horde.np0fbkrfk-jumt5krom4...@andreasschulze.de you write: someone from amazon Germany may be interested. Again: I guess it's a legit message from amazon, otherwise let me know ... It looks fine. How does your code pass the DKIM validation results to the DMARC code?

Re: [dmarc-discuss] amazon.de fail

2015-06-16 Thread A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
Hello John, John Levine via dmarc-discuss: It looks fine. in which sense? - RFC5322.From is amazon.DE - SPF pass for bounces.amazon.COM - DKIM pass for amazonses.COM so neither SPF nor DKIM is aligned. according to the published record the message should be quarantined: $ opendmarc-check

Re: [dmarc-discuss] amazon.de fail

2015-06-16 Thread Elizabeth Zwicky via dmarc-discuss
In one version you also havedkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=amazon.deĀ  header.i=@marketplace.amazon.de header.b=AOE4Rr31 which is an aligned pass because marketplace.amazon.de inherits amazon.de's record which doesn't specify strictness of alignment and therefore defaults to

Re: [dmarc-discuss] amazon.de fail

2015-06-16 Thread John Levine via dmarc-discuss
Would be good to hear from Murray if this is the intended use-case for OpenDMARC. In general I know OpenDMARC simply as an A-R header parser. So my assumptions could not be completely wrong... I call the libraries directly, so in my implementation nothing parses A-R headers at all. R's, John

[dmarc-discuss] amazon.de fail

2015-06-16 Thread A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
Hello, someone from amazon Germany may be interested. Again: I guess it's a legit message from amazon, otherwise let me know ... Authentication-Results: idvmailin13.datevnet.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=amazonses.com header.i=@amazonses.com header.b=IGahw/4Y