Re: [dmarc-discuss] RUF reports

2017-01-05 Thread Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
A local_policy override is a discretionary choice by the receiver; it's not clear what choice is being made or why. Failure reports are sent at the discretion of the receiver, and then only when they determine a failure, which in this case has not occurred for receiver-local reasons. -

Re: [dmarc-discuss] RUF reports

2017-01-05 Thread Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Steven M Jones wrote: > On 01/05/2017 17:32, Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss wrote: >> I've been trying, albeit slowly, to determine why I haven't seen any >> RUF reports since Sept 2016. >> >> Shouldn't this RUA report also produce a corresponding

Re: [dmarc-discuss] RUF reports

2017-01-05 Thread Steven M Jones via dmarc-discuss
On 01/05/2017 17:32, Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss wrote: > I've been trying, albeit slowly, to determine why I haven't seen any > RUF reports since Sept 2016. > > Shouldn't this RUA report also produce a corresponding RUF? Are you DKIM signing these messages? Because I notice the reason given

[dmarc-discuss] RUF reports

2017-01-05 Thread Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss
Hello, I've been trying, albeit slowly, to determine why I haven't seen any RUF reports since Sept 2016. Shouldn't this RUA report also produce a corresponding RUF? http://domainmail.org/dmarc-reports/126.com%21inug.org%211483574400%211483660799.xml -Jim P.