Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

>I guess I'm now more inclined to remove the rua= stanza as I don't >manage user accounts and am really only interested in the failures. I concur with Roland. Looking at my failure reports, I see some from Hotmail and Linkedin and beyond that a few from Chinese and Russian ISPs generally

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

Jim, Bear in mind that all reporting is at the good graces of receivers; the options to fine-tune what is sent may, or may not, actually be implemented by any given receiver. (This isn't an interoperability or conformance comment so much as a real-world systems one. Postel's Law definitely

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:50 PM, John Levine wrote: > In article > you > write: >>Hello, >> >>I'm trying to limit RUA/RUFs to legitimate emails that need eyeballs. >> >>To that end, I'm scratching my head as

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Why do I receive RUAs for emails that align?

In article you write: >Hello, > >I'm trying to limit RUA/RUFs to legitimate emails that need eyeballs. > >To that end, I'm scratching my head as to why I get RUAs that clearly align. That's how it works. See section 7.2 of RFC