Re: [dmarc-discuss] Hotmail violating DMARC specification

2018-09-25 Thread Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Calendaring corner cases are numerous. If the calendaring system is to co-operate with DMARC (but note that it's not a foregone conclusion that the operator will want to do so) the options in this case would appear to be: * Take ownership of the forwarded message by setting From: to the

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Help - updataed

2018-09-25 Thread Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
What is a DMARC syntax error? (Which tool gave this? What operation was it performing at the time?) Yes, example.com TXT "v=spf1 -all" _dmarc.example.com "v=DMARC1; p=reject;" is a reasonable way to announce that a domain can never be used for sending email. - Roland On 26/09/18

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Hotmail violating DMARC specification (fwd)

2018-09-25 Thread John R Levine via dmarc-discuss
In article <530ab12f-8f41-478f-8e2c-8b276ae9d...@gmail.com>, Ivan Kovachev via dmarc-discuss wrote: I have also run some tests using a DMARC protected domain in reject mode and hotmail whether manually forwarding, auto-forwarding or redirecting the email treats the email in the same way and

[dmarc-discuss] Hotmail violating DMARC specification

2018-09-25 Thread Ivan Kovachev via dmarc-discuss
Hello guys, would anyone be able to comment on the issue listed here: https://office365.uservoice.com/forums/264636-general/suggestions/34012756-forwarding-of-calendar-appointments-from-a-dmarc-p