I'm going to follow up on John's comments, giving my perspective as someone
who has been a participant in the dmarc.org team from the beginning. Again,
my personal perspective.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:17 PM John Levine via dmarc-discuss <
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote:
> In article
Jonathan,
> For example, one poster claimed that no "mailbox provider" should ever
> be using "p=quarantine" or "p=reject" in their DMARC policy. This
> confuses me. If the mailbox providers, ... are not expected to be able
> to definitively assert which emails claiming to be from them are
>
In article <963257f9-0f6b-516b-59ea-b72852a4d...@quantopian.com> you write:
>I thought the goal of DMARC was that eventually the maintainer of every
>domain on the internet that shows up in the From: line of email messages
>will be able to reliably tell the rest of the internet which of those
This is a spin-off from the thread I started yesterday about p=none vs
"p=reject; pct=0".
I thought the goal of DMARC was that eventually the maintainer of every
domain on the internet that shows up in the From: line of email messages
will be able to reliably tell the rest of the internet
On 09/10/2018 23:37, John Levine via dmarc-discuss wrote:
> In article <24dd5bc1-ca89-473c-9d11-cb712504c...@akamai.com> you write:
>> p=none -> “we’re trying to figure out if we’re going to be able to go to
>> p=quarantine”
>>
>> If you treat quarantine differently than none, you’re sending me
On 09/10/2018 15:59, Jonathan Kamens via dmarc-discuss wrote:
> I see people behaving badly here in both directions. In my opinion,
> servers that do message forwarding should rewrite headers for DMARC
> compliance whenever there is a DMARC policy, not just when the policy
> is *p=quarantine* or
On 10/10/18 01:02, Payne, John via dmarc-discuss wrote:
I believe that p= should trigger “special handling” if there
is any to be triggered. p=none is semantically different from the
record not existing, but it’s being treated the same.
It is an important characteristic of the current
On 10/10/18 03:28, Payne, John via dmarc-discuss wrote:
p=none -> “we’re trying to figure out if we’re going to be able to go to
p=quarantine”
While that's undoubtedly true in many cases, it's certainly not true in
all, and the spec does not make this assumption.
If you treat quarantine
