Re: [dmarc-discuss] What is the end goal of DMARC?

2018-10-15 Thread John Levine via dmarc-discuss
In article , Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss wrote: >I'd favor domain.INVALID. Its only defect originates from a dubious >reject-on-nxdomain advocacy, which would require to use domains with wildcard >records (e.g. domain.REMOVE.DMARC.TRAILING.PARTS). I did INVALID for a while and it was a

Re: [dmarc-discuss] What is the end goal of DMARC?

2018-10-15 Thread Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:44 AM Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss wrote: > The best path, IMHO, would be to accept that list messages are sent from the > list, since lists add their mark to the content. That is pretty much the rough consensus today -- there's lots of that out in the wild,

Re: [dmarc-discuss] What is the end goal of DMARC?

2018-10-15 Thread Alessandro Vesely via dmarc-discuss
On Sun 14/Oct/2018 16:29:15 +0200 Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss wrote: >> >>> Rewriting the from address to something that fails -- and thus is >>> potentially going to fail delivery at any ISP that checks to see if >>> the from address is valid -- seems crappy to me. >> >> Sorry, I don't