inktechs.net/>
Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com
From: Roland Turner
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 5:36 PM
To: Dennis Burgess ; Vladimir Dubrovin
; dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC oddity
Right. This is the envelope sender (5321.MAIL FROM). I
http://www.linktechs.net
>> <http://www.linktechs.net/>
>>
>> Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*Vladimir Dubrovin
>> *Sent:* Monday, November 26, 2018 1:28 PM
>> *To:* Dennis Burgess ; dmarc-discuss@dmarc
vember 26, 2018 1:28 PM
*To:* Dennis Burgess ; dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
*Subject:* Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC oddity
You see envelope-from (aka RFC 5321.mailfrom) address in logs, while
DMARC checks policy against From: header (RFC 5322.From),
envelope-from and From: may differ.
26.11.201
Is the DMARC milter behind a separate gateway filter?
>milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE from filter1.linktechs.email[127.0.0.1]:
If so, the DMARC milter may be checking the email against the wrong
information, DMARC milters often require some custom setup to ignore the
apparent source (the gateway)
te:
http://www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Create Wireless Coverage’s with www.towercoverage.com
From: Vladimir Dubrovin
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 1:28 PM
To: Dennis Burgess ; dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] DMARC oddity
You see envelope-from (aka RFC 5321.ma
You see envelope-from (aka RFC 5321.mailfrom) address in logs, while
DMARC checks policy against From: header (RFC 5322.From), envelope-from
and From: may differ.
26.11.2018 22:17, Dennis Burgess via dmarc-discuss пишет:
>
> Got an odd one, getting e-mails from another domain rejected based on
>
