Re: [dmarc-discuss] Neebie Questions about Spoofing Prevention and DMARC implementation

rc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org> on behalf of Marc Luescher via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> Sent: Wednesday, 4 November 2015 19:48 To: dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org Subject: [dmarc-discuss] Neebie Questions about Spoofing Prevention and DMARC implementation Hi there, I am new to th

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Neebie Questions about Spoofing Prevention and DMARC implementation

iscuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> Reply-To: <marc.luesc...@webgate.biz> Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 04:48 To: <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> Subject: [dmarc-discuss] Neebie Questions about Spoofing Prevention and DMARC implementation > Hi there, > > I am

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Neebie Questions about Spoofing Prevention and DMARC implementation

Hello Marc, Sorry to hear about your spoofing troubles. The situation sounds urgent and complex. My first suggestion would be to set expectations with your management team. You are embarking on a large project that will unearth email complexities that are not currently understood or appreciated.

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Neebie Questions about Spoofing Prevention and DMARC implementation

> On Nov 4, 2015, at 09:28, Paul Kincaid-Smith via dmarc-discuss > wrote: > > My first suggestion would be to set expectations with your management team. > You are embarking on a large project that will unearth email complexities > that are not currently understood

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Neebie Questions about Spoofing Prevention and DMARC implementation

Hey Marc, some thoughts inline: > On Nov 4, 2015, at 06:48, Marc Luescher via dmarc-discuss > wrote: > > It is my current understanding that the following order of things should be > followed : > > a) Publish a DMARC record with a domain to collect feedback > b)