On 04.10.2016 17:35, DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet via dmarc-discuss wrote:
> I have done a stock dmarc implementation on centos 7.
>
> We use MailScanner and spamassassin with decent success since many years. I
> would prefer a milter anyday so that I can influence my scores.
>
> My concerns
Zwicky
Cc: DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet; DMARC Discussion List
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] dmarc fail for linkedin
As Elizabeth said.
I suspect your implementation of openDMARC cannot see the SPF result in the
email.
You may want to read https://sourceforge.net/p/opendmarc/tickets/100
d to use the fail in conjunction with the spf=pass -
> then that premise is shot right?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> DP
>
>
>
> *From:* Franck Martin [mailto:fmar...@linkedin.com]
> *Sent:* 03 October 2016 23:56
> *To:* Roland Turner; DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet
&g
m*
> <http://www.trustsphere.com/>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org> on behalf of
> DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>
> *Sent:* Sunday, 2 October 2016
;http://www.trustsphere.com/>
From: dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss-boun...@dmarc.org> on behalf of DurgaPrasad
- DatasoftComnet via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org>
Sent: Sunday, 2 October 2016 23:16
To: 'dmarc-discuss'
Subject: [dmarc-di
