Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid

2016-04-07 Thread Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Franck Martin wrote: > Even in this case Lastname is not a valid mailbox as it does not have a valid > email address, That is my interpretation also. The ability of many MTAs to work with implicit domains internally is outside 5322's scope. - Roland On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:41 AM, A.

Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid

2016-04-06 Thread Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
Even in this case Lastname is not a valid mailbox as it does not have a valid email address, even when you take into account the EAI update it should have been written as Lastname; Strictly speaking the ABNI allows display name with no double quotes as long you don't use any special characters

Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid

2016-04-06 Thread Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
Of cause From: Lastname, Firstname is a result of omitted backslash or double quotes. The fact is, according to RFC 5322 it's valid RFC5322.From field with 2 mailboxes in it and is not covered by RFC 7489. OpenDMARC implementation follows to known best practices noticed in RFC

Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid

2016-04-06 Thread Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
Vladimir, We are not discussing here the fact you can put 2 mailboxes in a From: but that the display part must be between double quotes. A mailbox is an optional display part within double quotes followed by an email address within <>. Mailboxes are separated by comas ,. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at

Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid

2016-04-06 Thread Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss
It happens a lot.. The obsoleted format allowed it, not the recent one. I think we should ignore the obsolete format now... The problem is: From: j...@example.com Which certain quite old versions of .net do. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:26 AM, A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss <

Re: [dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid

2016-04-06 Thread Vladimir Dubrovin via dmarc-discuss
This From contains 2 mailboxes (Lastname and u...@yahoo.com). This is valid RFC 5322 syntax from= "From:" mailbox-list CRLF ... mailbox-list= (mailbox *("," mailbox)) / obs-mbox-list but it's invalid for DMARC RFC 7489 and it's not covered by DMARC specification:

[dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid

2016-04-06 Thread A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss
Hello, I noticed a message with this RFC5322.From: From: Lastname, Firstname the message was authenticated by SPF and DKIM but opendmarc rejected finally. Is this From really valid? I would quote the displayname. If it's valid, I hit a bug in OpenDMARC. If it's invalid,