On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
My question was rather carefully formed.
The intent, one assumes, of this list, is to examine and discuss
operational issues that relate to DMARC. It seems as though the
existence of a bug is being inferred; the archives
On 5/11/2014 2:22 PM, Al Iverson via dmarc-discuss wrote:
The intent, one assumes, of this list, is to examine and discuss
operational issues that relate to DMARC. It seems as though the
existence of a bug is being inferred; the archives don't reflect what
recipients receive, I read. But in
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
Although it does prompt the question of why you are working so hard to
avoid responding to the substance of the question I asked.
And no, I'm not expecting a useful response.
Dave, I apologize for frustrating you. Neither
Over the last few days I've gotten a number of bounces like this, all from
AOL:
Return-Path:
Received: from imb-d04.mx.aol.com (imb-d04.mx.aol.com [205.188.128.65])
by qs3710.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A76125427
for i...@kitterman.com; Sun, 11 May 2014 13:05:39 -0400
Besides the backscatter AOL is creating and should stop, seems you should move
your domain to p=reject to avoid that these spoofed emails get delivered to aol
users and others...
Printed on recycled paper!
On May 11, 2014, at 19:34, Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
You have p=none and ruf= turned on, AOL's doing exactly what you've
requested.
- Roland
On 05/12/2014 10:25 AM, Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss wrote:
Over the last few days I've gotten a number of bounces like this, all from
AOL:
Return-Path:
Received: from imb-d04.mx.aol.com
No. I care too much about actual mailing list traffic for that to be feasible.
If this is happening due to DMARC, a better solution for my use case would be
to remove my DMARC record.
Scott K
On Monday, May 12, 2014 03:01:00 Franck Martin wrote:
Besides the backscatter AOL is creating and
Look at the ruf= address and where it was sent. No. Not what I requested.
Scott K
On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:07:59 you wrote:
You have p=none and ruf= turned on, AOL's doing exactly what you've
requested.
- Roland
On 05/12/2014 10:25 AM, Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss wrote:
Over
Not exactly, the failure reports are not supposed to go back to the (fake)
sender but to the email specific by the ruf. This seems a delivery
notification, so besides a bug at AOL, I would think that the fake email
contains a delivery receipt header... Which AOL would honor...
I did not see
