Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> Am 13.05.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Terry Zink via dmarc-discuss:
>>> In Office 365 it would. Others' implementations may vary.
>>
>> "may or may not" - is that really the intention of DMARC?
>
> I think RFC 7489, paragraph 3.1.2 is very explicit about this. It is
>
A. Schulze wrote:
> Am 13.05.2016 um 22:35 schrieb Terry Zink via dmarc-discuss:
>> In Office 365 it would. Others' implementations may vary.
>
> "may or may not" - is that really the intention of DMARC?
That is how DMARC is specified, yes. Intention is a bit harder:
- the ideal is that all