Re: [dmarc-discuss] FBL via DMARC?

I should have pointed out first that this question is unrelated to DMARC. At best, we're discussing a comparable "put a record in the DNS" configuration mechanism for requesting abuse reports. Note in particular that "put abuse contacts into abuse.net" already exists, and isn't being

Re: [dmarc-discuss] FBL via DMARC?

I'd hazard a guess that confidentiality constraints get in the way here, for the same reason that most receivers won't provide DMARC failure reports, only aggregate reports. Note that the feedback mechanism for receivers who wish to volunteer reports already exists - and is the origin of

[dmarc-discuss] FBL via DMARC?

Has there been any discussion about using DMARC to configure spam complaint feedback loops? Currently it is only feasible to register for the big ESPs and can be tough to keep them up to date. DMARC could make this automatic and universal. It would be well within DMARC's mandate of domain

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Getting to reject, was :Re: FortiNet’s FortiMail DMARC implementation

Carl, this is great to hear. Thanks for sharing with us. Best regards, Al Iverson -- Al Iverson www.aliverson.com (312)725-0130 On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Carl Windsor via dmarc-discuss wrote: >>I would suggest a note saying that Fortinet's implementation is

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Getting to reject, was :Re: FortiNet’s FortiMail DMARC implementation

Well just so you know, I reported this bug to FortiNet almost a year ago 2015-12-09. That was when FortiMail got the DMARC implementation(firmware 5.3.0). Since that time we contacted their support, which gave us the answer I posted. So we tried to change it by contacting local Fortinet's

Re: [dmarc-discuss] Getting to reject, was :Re: FortiNet’s FortiMail DMARC implementation

Petr, Do you also kick small dogs? I'd suggest that a 2-week turnaround on a bug that's non-critical for Fortinet's customers is pretty impressive. On the meaning of "by design", there are of course multiple designs (intentions) present. Surely you're familiar with the tree-swing project