According DNSViz, and the Cloudflare, Google and Verisign public resolvers the
qname below has a TLSA record, but Quad returns an apparently valid denial of
existence. It is possible that Quad9 is "the guilty party" here only by
accident, and had I asked at another time, some other server would
On 2019/11/25 19:57, Wesley Peng wrote:
> If I want to run my own nameservers, saying they are:
>
> ns1.wsly.de. 1.2.3.4
> ns2.wsly.de. 5.6.7.8
>
>
> Would I put the glues into DE's registry, or shall I put glues into all
> registries, including COM, NET, INFO, ccTLD etc?
You would publish
John,
on 2019/11/26 9:35, John W. O'Brien wrote:
Are ns{1,2}.wsly.de authoritative for wsly.de? Then glue is required in
DE. Otherwise probably not [0].
Yes I plan to setup ns{1,2}.wsly.de to be wsly.de's auth-nameservers.
Thank you for pointing out that.
Regards.
Hello
If I want to run my own nameservers, saying they are:
ns1.wsly.de. 1.2.3.4
ns2.wsly.de. 5.6.7.8
Would I put the glues into DE's registry, or shall I put glues into all
registries, including COM, NET, INFO, ccTLD etc?
Thanks.
___
Thank you for instant support Peter. I love DENIC.
on 2019/11/25 22:38, Peter Koch wrote:
without knowing details about the registrar/reseller chain that you might be
using, informing the registrar of such a change is a prerequisite for the
delegation to change at the TLD level. That means,
Funny you should mention this. It just occurred to me, although it also
apparently occurred to one other soul on the dnsrpz mailing list, you can
use RPZ to audit and to some extent contain leakage.
Assuming you own example.com, I'm speaking about entries akin to the
following:
jim> What do you consider to be a lot of queries? The root server system
jim> collectively handles 500K-1M queries per second. That seems rather
jim> a lot to me. YMMV.
fw> But globally? For the entire planet?
fw> It's certainly beyond what I can run out of my basement using spare
fw> parts,
* Jim Reid:
>> On 25 Nov 2019, at 20:54, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>
>> The query numbers are surprisingly low. To me at last.
>
> What do you consider to be a lot of queries? The root server system
> collectively handles 500K-1M queries per second. That seems rather a
> lot to me. YMMV.
But
> On 25 Nov 2019, at 20:54, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> The query numbers are surprisingly low. To me at last.
What do you consider to be a lot of queries? The root server system
collectively handles 500K-1M queries per second. That seems rather a lot to me.
YMMV. I don't know of any other
> On Nov 25, 2019, at 9:54 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> The query numbers are surprisingly low. To me at last.
Duane Wessels did a good study some time ago of queries to the root. I believe
over 99% were bogus, not real queries for resolvable things.
> Do we know why the number of root
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 09:54:55PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Do we know why the number of root instances has increased? Is it
> because of the incoming data is interesting?
I would venture the latter. This remains a seriously underdiscussed subject.
There is of course "logging of all
* Mark Allman:
> Left here to be ripped apart ... :-)
The query numbers are surprisingly low. To me at last.
Do we know why the number of root instances has increased? Is it
because of the incoming data is interesting?
___
dns-operations mailing
Left here to be ripped apart ... :-)
Mark Allman. On Eliminating Root Nameservers from the DNS, ACM
SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets), November
2019.
https://www.icir.org/mallman/pubs/All19b/
Abstract:
The Domain Name System (DNS) leverages nearly 1K
Thanks for updating the info Victor.
>
> On Nov 25, 2019 at 10:10 PM, (mailto:ietf-d...@dukhovni.org)> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 02:56:51PM +0100, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
>
> > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> > > wsly.de. 86400 IN NS
If we are directly integrated with the registry then a nameserver change is
almost instant.
But we aren’t directly integrated with all registries and not all of them
handle DNS changes in the same way
Some, for example, will do a pre-check before they’ll allow a change.
--
Mr Michele Neylon
I saw blacknight does good business on domain industry. How do you handle DNS
delegation like my case? Thanks.
>
> On Nov 25, 2019 at 10:22 PM, (mailto:mich...@blacknight.com)> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> That depends on how they’re integrated
>
>
>
>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:20:17PM +0800, Wesley Peng wrote:
> When I changed name servers in registrar, won’t they be registered into DE’s
> servers automatically? Thank you.
without knowing details about the registrar/reseller chain that you might be
using, informing the registrar of such a
That depends on how they’re integrated
It’s really a question you need to be asking them
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
https://www.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.blog/
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Personal blog:
Hello
When I changed name servers in registrar, won’t they be registered into DE’s
servers automatically? Thank you.
>
> On Nov 25, 2019 at 9:56 PM, mailto:e...@4ever.de)> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Wesley,
>
> postmas...@wsly.de (Wesley Peng) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 02:56:51PM +0100, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> > wsly.de.86400 IN NS art.ns.cloudflare.com.
> > wsly.de.86400 IN NS roxy.ns.cloudflare.com.
>
> In order to update the records in "de" you need your
Hi Wesley,
postmas...@wsly.de (Wesley Peng) wrote:
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> wsly.de.86400 IN NS ns1.alldomains.hosting.
> wsly.de.86400 IN NS ns2.alldomains.hosting.
> wsly.de.86400 IN NS ns3.alldomains.hosting.
Hallo,
I am confused about my domain's DNS glues. The domain is: wsly.de
When I queried to .de's root nameservers, I got:
$ dig wsly.de @n.de.net
; <<>> DiG 9.11.3-1ubuntu1-Ubuntu <<>> wsly.de @n.de.net
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id:
22 matches
Mail list logo
