Re: [docbook-apps] Fwd: Thanks!

2014-09-05 Thread natk
Hi Mary, I'd be interested in your solutions to your webhelp issues. I've currently got webhelp in beta, with HTML and PDF in production. I've come across a number of webhelp issues and I'm not happy with this format yet. Nat On 5/09/2014, at 1:35 pm, Mary Tabasko taba...@telerama.com wrote:

Re: [docbook-apps] Thanks!

2014-09-05 Thread Barton Wright
Hi Mary, Ditto what Nat said. Thanks! ~Barton Wright Hi Mary, I'd be interested in your solutions to your webhelp issues. I've currently got webhelp in beta, with HTML and PDF in production. I've come across a number of webhelp issues and I'm not happy with this format yet. Nat

Re: [docbook-apps] Fwd: Thanks!

2014-09-05 Thread Jirka Kosek
On 5.9.2014 10:58, Wegmann, Frank wrote: Personally, I’d favor to deploy the DocBook stylesheets, since I know my ways around them, but leveraging the stylesheets from the module to a set level without using the set mechanism looks to me to be way beyond trivial. Or has this been done

RE: [docbook-apps] Fwd: Thanks!

2014-09-05 Thread Wegmann, Frank
Yes, we want to generate one WebHelp from several DocBook books. Frank -Original Message- From: Jirka Kosek [mailto:ji...@kosek.cz] Sent: Freitag, 5. September 2014 11:14 To: Wegmann, Frank; docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Fwd: Thanks! On 5.9.2014 10:58,

Re: [docbook-apps] Fwd: Thanks!

2014-09-05 Thread Thomas Schraitle
Hi Frank, On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:58:54 + Wegmann, Frank frank.wegm...@softwareag.com wrote: [...] We use them for producing PDF files in large volumes, deploying DocBook as an intermediate format generated from our in-house XML dialect. Now we want to step up and replace our HTML

Re: [docbook-apps] Fwd: Thanks!

2014-09-05 Thread Jirka Kosek
On 5.9.2014 11:18, Wegmann, Frank wrote: Yes, we want to generate one WebHelp from several DocBook books. And have you tried to process books as a one set solely for purpose of Webhelp geneation? -- -- Jirka Kosek e-mail:

[docbook-apps] Multiple biblioid's extra itemref in epub3 spine

2014-09-05 Thread Peter Fleck
Hi all. I'm probably doing something silly but here's my problem: I use the /docbook-xsl-ns-1.78.1/epub3/profile-chunk.xsl/ style sheet in a custom layer and call Either --stringparam profile.condition epub or --stringparam profile.condition mobi And it picks the correct /biblioid/ below

Re: [docbook-apps] Thanks!

2014-09-05 Thread David Cramer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I'd suggest finding common solutions to the major issues and contributing back to the distribution so you can avoid fixing the same problems in different ways and having to maintain those in your own forks. Maybe start with some discussion here and

Re: [docbook-apps] Thanks!

2014-09-05 Thread David Cramer
On 9/5/14, 10:03 AM, David Cramer wrote: Should other options for search be provided? E.g. you could replace the javascript search with a Google site search. Believe it or not, all the books in the API Documentation portion of this site is actually webhelp (it's my former employer and I was

Re: [docbook-apps] Fwd: Thanks!

2014-09-05 Thread David Cramer
On 9/5/14, 4:20 AM, Thomas Schraitle wrote: With olinks you don't need a set necessarily and performance issues are also not important. I guess Webhelp does support olinks too as it is derived from the HTML stylesheets. However, I'm not sure, so you better try it out. We used olink with

Re: [docbook-apps] Multiple biblioid's extra itemref in epub3 spine

2014-09-05 Thread Peter Lavin
Hi Peter, I think you should be using the profile.xsl style sheet under the profile directory rather than epub3/profile-chunk.xsl. Then apply your epub transformation against the file output by profiling. On 5 September 2014 10:58, Peter Fleck peterfl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all. I'm

RE: [docbook-apps] Fwd: Thanks!

2014-09-05 Thread Mary Tabasko
Frank Wegmann said: our documentation sets often consist of many modules resulting in as many DocBook files (and as many PDF files), but to produce a single WebHelp for all of them it seems the only way is to wrap all DocBook files into a single set. Is that correct? Because I feel this is