On 2023-07-19 4:08 pm, Gerald Galster wrote:
> A 50-100 mailbox user server will run Dovecot CE just fine. Pro would be
> overkill. What is overkill? I always thought it had a bit more features and
> support.
For Pro 2.3, you need (at minimum) 7 Dovecot nodes + HA authentication
+ HA
Here is the info from dovecot -n
dovecot.mail-server and postfix.mail-server are valid dns entries for
themselves. It's running on a kubernetes cluster so those hostnames are
provided by the namespace and pod name, they work too, you can ping them
and it works for everything except emails with
> Op 20 jul. 2023 om 14:26 heeft Chris Thomas het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting a curious problem where if I write a draft without an attachment
> and click save. It'll work without any issue at all.
>
> But if I do the same, then attach a file to the email, it'll sit
Hi,
I'm getting a curious problem where if I write a draft without an
attachment and click save. It'll work without any issue at all.
But if I do the same, then attach a file to the email, it'll sit there for
a couple of minutes before timing out (I'm using thunderbird), it'll
eventually give
> We are slowly but surely FORCED to use external/cloud services as Open
> (and even closed) source tools are no longer use-able on own/private
> infrastructures or need nuclear plan like budget and implementation
> time/ressources (Yes it is a bit exaggerated ;-) )
>
There are still people out
Le 20/07/2023 à 00:57, Michael Slusarz via dovecot a écrit :
On 07/19/2023 2:54 PM MDT Michael Grimm via dovecot wrote:
Michael Slusarz via dovecot wrote:
On 07/18/2023 9:00 AM MDT Gerald Galster wrote:
While I understand it takes effort to maintain the replication plugin, this is
Le 19/07/2023 à 22:08, Gerald Galster a écrit :
A 50-100 mailbox user server will run Dovecot CE just fine. Pro would
be overkill.
What is overkill? I always thought it had a bit more features and support.
For Pro 2.3, you need (at minimum) 7 Dovecot nodes + HA authentication + HA
storage +
Le 19/07/2023 à 23:03, Michael Peddemors a écrit :
In theory, that is how it is SUPPOSED to work, in practice (and we
have lots of history where customers ran into this problem when one
went down), I believe that it was Outlook that didn't try an
alternative IP address for a 20 min internal
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 10:30:32PM -0600, Michael Slusarz via dovecot wrote:
> For a variety of software, maintenance, and (yes) business reasons, there
> comes a time when decisions need to be made to move beyond existing software.
> This is completely normal in software development, and there
