I'm stuck with using Qmail which has no LMTP support, and thus I'm
using dovecot-lda which has certain drawbacks.
Has anyone found a way to direct dovecot-lda to deliver the mail to
the LMTP server or any other way for Qmail to deliver the mail to the
LMTP server directly ?
Thanks!
Hi Aki,
sorry for hijacking this thread, but when you do a SEARCH at least
there's an 'Indexing update' being returned from the server.
If the mailbox is not indexed and you do a SORT it just hangs with no
update whatsoever until it completes.
I think it would be beneficial to update the
Is this the same bug that John created a patch for but then
Dovecot fixed differently in the latest version ?
The one with the assertion ? If so, I thought it was fixed, no ?
On Tuesday, 09/02/2021 at 17:32 Arjen Heidinga wrote:
On 08-02-2021 18:40, deano-dove...@areyes.com wrote:
>
> Do we
You can write something similar and I think others did already if
you Google for it. Shouldn't take you more than 1-2h to write
something in Perl:connect to backend, no login, remove from director
On Saturday, 16/01/2021 at 22:37 Steven Varco wrote:
Hi Christian
This confused me as well.
I
27 by
Stephan Bosch
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/799b52accf71e86756dde738d22c1c6a500a7e29#diff-1c02b3481573ffd33c9abccd3f5a6752a5cd81ca83389f4380657f7309c06366
On Saturday, 31/10/2020 at 08:40 John Fawcett wrote:
On 31/10/2020 00:18, Scott Q. wrote:
I have implemented
Fawcett wrote:
On 21/10/2020 16:44, Patrik Peng wrote:
On 16.10.20 18:34, Patrik Peng wrote:
On 16.10.20 18:00, Scott Q. wrote:
This reminds me, the way I was able to reproduce this consistently
was by having large headers ( 100+ lines ).
On Friday, 16/10/2020 at 11:49 Patrik Peng
no spam/virus filtering ? Virtual suicide these days :P
On Monday, 26/10/2020 at 16:13 R. Diez wrote:
> Start of a HOWTO:
>
> 1) Install dovecot, create virtual accounts for all of your users
> 2) Install fetchmail, make it pull the ISPs IMAP and deliver locally
> 3) Install postfix as a
There's no ambiguity here, if you send a message, you are the
sender. The envelope from should be yours.
On Sunday, 25/10/2020 at 11:48 Marc Roos wrote:
Say someone has setup spf for his domain and sends an email to a user
that has in roundcube enabled the sieve forward. If the message is
This reminds me, the way I was able to reproduce this consistently
was by having large headers ( 100+ lines ).
On Friday, 16/10/2020 at 11:49 Patrik Peng wrote:
On 19.08.20 17:37, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 17:03:57 +0200, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Hi, after
time, so I really don't know what to think.
On Thursday, 15/10/2020 at 09:59 Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020-09-07, Scott Q. wrote:
>
> Not sure if I mentioned it but I'm on FreeBSD too. I wonder if any
> of the patches FreeBSD applies automatically is causing this. I
looked
>
, 22/09/2020 at 02:33 Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 18.9.2020 17.45, Scott Q. wrote:
> Does anyone know if it's possible to do FTS Index based on a userdb
> preference ? Basically if the preference is 'on' , dovecot goes
ahead
> with the fts indexing for that particular user.
>
> I'm guessing
Does anyone know if it's possible to do FTS Index based on a
userdb preference ? Basically if the preference is 'on' , dovecot goes
ahead with the fts indexing for that particular user.
I'm guessing right now it's not possible but is there anyone that
could envision writing such a patch ? If so,
but I hope there is no difference with
single drive.
Thank you
Milo
Dne 09.09.2020 v 15:51 Scott Q. napsal(a):
> The 9361-8i does support passthrough ( JBOD mode ). Make sure you
have
> the latest firmware.
The 9361-8i does support passthrough ( JBOD mode ). Make sure you
have the latest firmware.
On Wednesday, 09/09/2020 at 03:55 Miloslav Hůla wrote:
Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline...
Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a):
> Miloslav> Hello,
> Miloslav> I sent this into
Here's a few tips:
1. I assume that's a 2U format -24 bays. You only have 1 raid card
for all 24 disks ? Granted you only have 16, but usually you should
assign 1 card per 8 drives. In our standard 2U chassis we have 3 hba's
per 8 drives. Your backplane should support that.
2. Add more drives
3.
Not sure if I mentioned it but I'm on FreeBSD too. I wonder if any
of the patches FreeBSD applies automatically is causing this. I looked
through them but couldn't find anything obvious that might cause this
--- configure.orig 2020-08-12 12:20:51 UTC
+++ configure
@@ -28901,13 +28901,13 @@
I've actually done a lot of debugging on this and it has to do
with very large headers in e-mails.
I've sent to Jeff the full GDB debug output and from what I gathered
myself, I can replicate the bug 100% of the time when I send a message
with 100 header lines of
x-locaweb-id:
, Scott Q. wrote:
> Sorry to bump up an old thread.
>
> 2.3.11.3 already contains this patch and the error still gets
> generated.
I'm not sure where you are finding it. The below patch isn't on the
release-2.3.11 branch. It isn't in the 2.3.11.3 tarball. It
isn't even on
master
Sorry to bump up an old thread.
2.3.11.3 already contains this patch and the error still gets
generated.
Anything else we could try ?
Scott
On Wednesday, 19/08/2020 at 11:37 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 17:03:57 +0200, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the upgrade
19 matches
Mail list logo
