On 05/04/2024 17:49 EEST Marc via dovecot
wrote:
doveadm sync -u testacc
'mdbox:/home/testing/testacc/mdbox:INDEX=/home/testing/
testacc/index:CONT
ROL=/home/testing/testacc/mail/control:LAYOUT=index'
>
> >
> > doveadm sync -u testacc
> 'mdbox:/home/testing/testacc/mdbox:INDEX=/home/testing/testacc/index:CONT
> ROL=/home/testing/testacc/mail/control:LAYOUT=index'
> >
> > Which gives me the expectec result. But I have also an archive
> namespace and an alt namespace that is going to be quite a lot
> On 05/04/2024 15:53 EEST Marc via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > breaking the mail index
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize
> > mailbox
> > > > > > renaming
> > > > > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or
> > > >
> > > > > > > breaking the mail index
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize
> mailbox
> > > > > renaming
> > > > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate
> > > indices)?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Dovecot is, if you
> On 05/04/2024 13:26 EEST Marc wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > breaking the mail index
> > > > >
> > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox
> > > > renaming
> > > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate
> > indices)?
> > > > >
> > >
