Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

Hi Stephan, Stephan Bosch (Mi 01 Jun 2016 13:02:24 CEST): … Thanks for the hint: > The wiki should be pretty clear about this. Using Xi packages for production > systems is a very bad idea, unless perhaps you carefully review and test it > on another system before every

Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

Op 30-5-2016 om 22:06 schreef aki.tu...@dovecot.fi: On May 30, 2016 at 10:26 PM Heiko Schlittermann wrote: Heiko Schlittermann (Mo 30 Mai 2016 21:18:09 CEST): Hi Aki, aki.tu...@dovecot.fi (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST):

Re: Ubuntu package - Was: Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

Hi Patrick, Patrick Domack (Mi 01 Jun 2016 02:22:17 CEST): > Those are my packages. I try to track each release, and bug fixed. … > I do consider them stable enough for other people to use, but again, your at > my mercy. (But these are what I use on my production systems

Re: Ubuntu package - Was: Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

Those are my packages. I try to track each release, and bug fixed. But since those are mine, I'm really concerned with stability as it affects my enviroment. Mainly mdbox/maildir with gzip, at this present time. If someone lets me know of any issues, I will fix and adjust for it, but I'm

Re: Ubuntu package - Was: Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

Hi, Peter Chiochetti (Di 31 Mai 2016 10:31:50 CEST): > Not having installed any of the two, I can say, as a Ubuntu user: > In ppa "/etc/init.d/dovecot" is a symlink to "/lib/init/upstart-job" The 2.2.24 on 16.04 installs both /etc/init.d/dovecot

Ubuntu package - Was: Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

… You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/, if it helps. The HTTP API should not suffer from the username problem. Thank you. I just used ppa:patrickdk/production, but probably will try the xi.dovecot.fi packages. The question is, which of these locations is more trustworthy

Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

> On May 30, 2016 at 10:26 PM Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > > Heiko Schlittermann (Mo 30 Mai 2016 21:18:09 CEST): > > Hi Aki, > > > > aki.tu...@dovecot.fi (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST): > > … > > > You can get packages

Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

Heiko Schlittermann (Mo 30 Mai 2016 21:18:09 CEST): > Hi Aki, > > aki.tu...@dovecot.fi (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST): > … > > You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/, if it helps. The > > HTTP API should not suffer from the username

Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

Hi Aki, aki.tu...@dovecot.fi (Mo 30 Mai 2016 20:57:58 CEST): … > You can get packages from http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian/, if it helps. The > HTTP API should not suffer from the username problem. Thank you. I just used ppa:patrickdk/production, but probably will try the

Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

> On May 30, 2016 at 9:54 PM Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > > Hi Aki, > > thank your for responding that fast. > > aki.tu...@dovecot.fi (Mo 30 Mai 2016 17:49:53 CEST): > … > > Hi! This has been fixed in 2.2.24. There was a bug in user passing. >

Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

Hi Aki, thank your for responding that fast. aki.tu...@dovecot.fi (Mo 30 Mai 2016 17:49:53 CEST): … > Hi! This has been fixed in 2.2.24. There was a bug in user passing. Ok, thus at least your answer saves me hours of debugging. We upgraded old Ubuntu Boxes (14.04/LTS)

Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

> On May 30, 2016 at 6:17 PM Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > > Hi, > > I'm doing quota checks from a remote machine (the real setup is a bit > more complex, if necessary I can explain it in more detail, but I just > extracted the bits that are easily reproduceable) > >

Re: doveadm-server protocol change?

> On May 30, 2016 at 6:17 PM Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > > Hi, > > I'm doing quota checks from a remote machine (the real setup is a bit > more complex, if necessary I can explain it in more detail, but I just > extracted the bits that are easily reproduceable) > >