On 03.09.20 01:57, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>> 1598480923.401085 220 myhostname ESMTP Exim 4.94 Wed, 26 Aug 2020
>> 18:28:43 -0400
>> 1598480923.401906 250-myhostname Hello localhost [::1]
>> 1598480923.401906 250-SIZE 52428800
>> 1598480923.401906 250-8BITMIME
>> 1598480923.401906
Hi Stephan,
I actually found the problem.
If I downgrade to 2.3.10.1, it no longer crashes and outputs a proper
error message. The issue was here:
> ssl_client_ca_file = Will investigate..
>
> On 28/08/2020 01:07, Alec Moskvin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to set up the submission
On 29/08/2020 21:04, Alec Moskvin wrote:
Hello,
I have a rule to always delete a header. If the message gets fileinto'd,
the header is gone, but if it's delivered into the INBOX through
implicit keep, the header does not get deleted.
Interestingly, if I remove the "if duplicate" filter, the
Will investigate..
On 28/08/2020 01:07, Alec Moskvin wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to set up the submission proxy, but if I set
submission_relay_ssl = starttls, it crashes. Without it, it works.
Please find the details below.
Thanks,
Alec
dovecot[256855]: submission-login: Login: user=,
On 28/08/2020 01:11, Alec Moskvin wrote:
Hello,
When connecting to Exim 4.94, dovecot submission logs this warning:
dovecot[25235]: submission(alec)<25347>: Warning:
smtp-client: conn localhost:25 ([::1]:25) [1]: Received invalid EHLO response line:
Unexpected character in EHLO keyword
On 20/08/2020 09:20, Gerry wrote:
On 8/20/20 2:56 PM, Admin Beckspaced wrote:
If postfix is handling your submission service you can have a look at
postfwd
https://www.postfwd.org/
I use it to limit sending of emails, recipients, etc, etc
Thanks for the suggestion!
I am using Postfix as
On 19/08/2020 17:37, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 17:03:57 +0200, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Hi,
after the upgrade to Dovecot 2.3.11.3, from 2.3.10.1, I see frequently
these errors from different users:
It looks like this has been around for a while and you just got unlucky
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 15:52:36 -0400, Scott Q. wrote:
> Sorry about that. My FreeBSD system automatically applied your
> patches and I assumed they were already part of the master.
No problem, it happens :)
Since your setup has a bit of a mind of its own, I have to ask... are you
sure you were
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:04:20 +, Daan van Gorkum wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks again for your insights. I understand that a lot of features are
> pending and it's totally fine, we're just very eager to use all these
> features.
I completely forgot that the work to add those fields was done
Sorry about that. My FreeBSD system automatically applied your
patches and I assumed they were already part of the master.
Unfortunately it still means the bug isn't resolved with these
changes.
On Wednesday, 02/09/2020 at 15:34 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 15:07:37
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 15:07:37 -0400, Scott Q. wrote:
> Sorry to bump up an old thread.
>
> 2.3.11.3 already contains this patch and the error still gets
> generated.
I'm not sure where you are finding it. The below patch isn't on the
release-2.3.11 branch. It isn't in the 2.3.11.3 tarball.
Sorry to bump up an old thread.
2.3.11.3 already contains this patch and the error still gets
generated.
Anything else we could try ?
Scott
On Wednesday, 19/08/2020 at 11:37 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 17:03:57 +0200, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the upgrade
The shipped systemctl unit file should have "remote-fs.target" added in
"After="?
--
Tom
Hi,
> I have installed two Debian 10.5 (SSH server) systems
> and I would like replicate mails between them.
> But the replication is very unstable.
> mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
I don't think mbox is suitable for replication. Try mdbox or sdbox.
Best regards
Gerald
Hi,
I have installed two Debian 10.5 (SSH server) systems
and I would like replicate mails between them.
But the replication is very unstable.
Before start of dovecot
Source mailbox: 278 messages, Destination mailbox: 0 messages
Another mailbox: 16887 messages, D.. 0 messages
After start of
> On 02/09/2020 13:51 Vitalii wrote:
>
>
> > > On 24/08/2020 08:30 Jesus Cea wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I would be personally interested in incremental purge per user. My
> > > personal IMAP account, for instance, has at this moment about 40GB
> > > of mdbox files. I keep most of my email
> > On 24/08/2020 08:30 Jesus Cea wrote:
> >
> >
> > I would be personally interested in incremental purge per user. My
> > personal IMAP account, for instance, has at this moment about 40GB
> > of mdbox files. I keep most of my email for decades, but sure I
> > could free some space doing a
On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:28:39 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> why not maildir+ ?
> mdbox imho keep used space until purged, where maildir+ does not
That's the point and good advantage as you can restore accidentally
deleted email later. Also it's speed up deleting and as a result
overall dovecot
On Tue, 1 Sep, 2020 at 09:59, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 1. Sep 2020, at 6.24, TACHIBANA Masashi
wrote:
Hi,
Is this expected or not?
From: us...@fuga.example.com
To: us...@hoge.example.com
↓
a uid fetch 43055 (envelope)
* 1860 FETCH (UID 43055 ENVELOPE ("Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:52:59 +0900"
On Tue, 1 Sep, 2020 at 07:03, @lbutlr wrote:
On 31 Aug 2020, at 06:23, Michael Gratton wrote:
Any word about this issue? Should I file a bug in an actual bug
tracker or something?
I don't think it's a bug?
Oh, I'm sure it was intentionally done, but it is still poor behaviour,
for the
I think, I've got a response on Serverfault, that helps me and I like to
give a complete example here. I was able to proxy IMAP and Submission
with the following settings:
dovecot.conf:
ssl_cert = password_query = SELECT NULL as password, 'y' as nopassword, 'y' as
proxy, NULL as
21 matches
Mail list logo
