Re: Is it possible to use per user keys with mail-crypt-plugin when using passwd-file backend?

> On 20/03/2021 22:43 Davy Landman wrote: > > > I've been reading quite a bit of discussions, the manual and a few often > linked posts about mail-crypt-plugin, but most of them seem to assume a sql > db backing. But if you are using a passwd file userdb, is it possible to make > the

Is it possible to use per user keys with mail-crypt-plugin when using passwd-file backend?

I've been reading quite a bit of discussions, the manual and a few often linked posts about mail-crypt-plugin, but most of them seem to assume a sql db backing. But if you are using a passwd file userdb, is it possible to make the per-user-key mode of the mail-crypt-plugin work? I like the trick

RE: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

Aki Tuomi wrote: > Yeah. Outlook does APPEND+EXPUNGE instead of MOVE. That rather critical item should probably be mentioned in the configuration manual; in my searching about on the problem, I didn't find anything that indicated this Microsoft-caused limitation. On the upside, I'm glad I

RE: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

> On 20/03/2021 20:30 dove...@steve.wattlink.net wrote: > > > Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > We provide this handy guide for teaching spam filters, see > > https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/antispam_with_sieve/ > > Yes, I followed that and am having trouble. I think (haven't yet

RE: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

Aki Tuomi wrote: > We provide this handy guide for teaching spam filters, see > https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/antispam_with_sieve/ Yes, I followed that and am having trouble. I think (haven't yet confirmed through a protocol trace) that the problem is Outlook using APPEND

RE: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

From: Gedalya Subject: Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all? On 3/20/21 7:37 AM, dove...@steve.wattlink.net wrote: Greetings! I feel like this has been beaten to death, but my searches on the web (and about 10 hours spent over the last two

Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

On 2021-03-20 7:14 a.m., Justina Colmena ~biz wrote: Spam versus ham is not the only sort of classification I would want to do on large volumes of email -- I might want to have separate folders to automatically classify incoming messages into separate categories for, say, friends-and-family,

Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

I have not yet enabled imapsieve -- so far I have had fairly good luck avoiding spam simply by using SPF+DKIM+DMARC and enabling basic verification of incoming mail with opendkim and opendmarc. Lately I have been reading some books on "fuzzy logic" and "fuzzy sets" with quite serious

Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

On 3/20/21 7:37 AM, dove...@steve.wattlink.net wrote: > > plugin { > >   imapsieve_mailbox1_before = > file:/usr/local/etc/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve > >   imapsieve_mailbox1_causes = COPY APPEND > >   imapsieve_mailbox1_name = Spam > >   imapsieve_mailbox2_before = >

Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

On 3/20/21 10:54 AM, Steve Watt wrote: > I thought I had enabled that – check out the doveconf -n listing.  Did I miss > something? IMAP METADATA for user-defined imapsieve scripts would be useful to you if you have clients that support that. If you know of any, please do share. > Mar 19

Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

> On 20/03/2021 05:55 Gedalya wrote: > > > On 3/20/21 7:37 AM, dove...@steve.wattlink.net wrote: > > > plugin { > > imapsieve_mailbox1_before = > > file:/usr/local/etc/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve > > imapsieve_mailbox1_causes = COPY APPEND > > imapsieve_mailbox1_name = Spam > >

Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

On 3/20/21 7:37 AM, dove...@steve.wattlink.net wrote: > > Greetings! > >   > > I feel like this has been beaten to death, but my searches on the web (and > about 10 hours spent over the last two days) haven’t revealed what’s going on. > >   > > Basically, it’s the usual “I’d like to auto-learn

Re: Mass Stripping Attachments by Directory, Age, Size

On 19/03/2021 07.31, Joseph Tam wrote: >> I've found the strip_attachments.pl script here < https://fossies.org/linux/Mail-Box/examples/strip-attachments.pl> which works fine on mbox (as tested on my local Thunderbird mboxes), but not on maildir which is on the dovecot server. My Perl isn't strong

Re: Mass Stripping Attachments by Directory, Age, Size

On 18/03/2021 16.52, Steven Varco wrote: > I would like such a feature too, but instead of deleting the atatchment files, I would like to „detach“ the files and save them into a sperate directory, which could be on a different storage like a share in the users home directory or even S3 and then