When I use the following command:
doveadm expunge -A mailbox Junk savedbefore 28d
I get:
doveadm(root): Error: User listing returned failure
In the mail log file it says:
dovecot: auth-worker(18549): Error: sql: Iterate query failed: Table
'system.users' doesn't exist (using built-in default
Hi!
I cannot connect to the dovecot server :-( I get Windows Mail Client Error:
800d9. Please help :-
# 2.0.beta6 (3156315704ef): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64 x86_64 Scientific Linux release 6.0 (Carbon)
auth_debug = yes
auth_debug_passwords = yes
hi all
I have a problem with the conversion of files containing UIDL Courier to dovecot
uidl , dovecot version is 1.2.15 , format in dovecot is pop3_uidl_format =
%08Xu%08Xv i try any other from available list without success
courierpop3dsizelist format
/2 920 1290084761
send same in email ( first saw the email )
uidl's are to above mailbox conversion
thanks for fast reply
1 UID87-1290084761 1 UID87-1290084761
2 UID88-1290084761 2 UID88-1290084761
3 UID89-1290084761 3 UID89-1290084761
4 UID90-1290084761 4 UID90-1290084761
.
.
.
.
775 UID909-1290084761
domain is the same as was , only ip is changed ( new machine for mx )
the same config ( i dont want to users had to change smth )
i'm confused :((
hmm, in the meantime i ran Courier on a new server and the situation is the same
messages are downloaded again, I do not understand completely why the change
machine ip is so important for email clients , or i miss smth :(
-tolerant if it also checked the validity of the PID that is in
/var/run/dovecot/master.pid.
Michael
4096 2008-01-16 11:50 login
-rw--- 1 root root 5 2008-01-16 11:50 master.pid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dovecot]#
I have no idea why it failed after the unclean shutdown/restart ...
curiouser and curiouser.
Michael
|
+++-+
8 rows in set (0.00 sec)
best regards
michael
routines:BN_EXPAND_INTERNAL:malloc failure
However, deleting the ssl-parameters.dat file and restarting dovecot
fixed the issue.
Michael
appreciated! Thanks in advance.
Regards, Michael.
Here is my dovecot.conf
# 2.0.19: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-042stab072.10 i686 Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
auth_debug_passwords = yes
auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master
auth_verbose = yes
disable_plaintext_auth
That worked! Thanks heaps.
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On
Behalf Of Thomas Leuxner
Sent: Wednesday, 30 January 2013 12:09 AM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] help with public namespace/mailbox
*
Michael
Hi, I don't think dsync works between 1.x and 2.x.
I have migrated a few of my clients exchange servers to my dovecot
servers and I always find LARCH https://github.com/rgrove/larch works
really well.
Michael.
On 17/04/2013 2:59 PM, Gregory Sloop wrote:
I hate to bug anyone about
On 23/04/2013 12:56 PM, Joseph Tam wrote:
I've read the web/man pages on dsync, but it's not clear to me whether
dsync can be used to export (rather than import) a user's mailbox to a
remote non-dovecot IMAP account.
(The intention is to use it whenever a user leaves and wants to copy
their
expire: mysql:/usr/local/dovecot/etc/dovecot-dict-expire.conf
Please help :-) What should I do to have the right codes for the folder names?
Best regards
Michael Lattari
: WiadomoAVs-ci-AVo-mieci 7 Elementy?usuniARk-te 7 INBOX 365
expire_dict: proxy::expire
dict:
quota: mysql:/etc/dovecot-dict-quota.conf
expire: mysql:/etc/dovecot-dict-expire.conf
Thanks!
Michael Lattari
?
Best regards
Michael Lattari
Yes but how to setup the expire tool for foldernames that contain spaces?
expire: WiadomoAVs-ci-AVo-mieci 7 Elementy?usuniARk-te 7 INBOX 365
does not work...
and
expire: WiadomoAVs-ci-AVo-mieci 7 Elementy usuniARk-te 7 INBOX 365
produces the following:
Stopping Dovecot Imap:
to reflect new
messages coming to their inbox after the original insert of the information.
It will only update the information when a user deletes a message.
Why is it not updating this information every time their mail is checked with
IMAP?
Cheers,
Michael
Has anyone been able to get Dovecot LDA working where each user has a
different UID?
All the howtos on the Internet I have found set the UID of a mailbox as fixed
for all users.
However I have tried to run it on the current SQL database we have (with
different UID per user) and I get the
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:43:54 Pascal Volk wrote:
On 12/31/2009 04:20 AM Michael wrote:
Hello all,
I have a Dovecot server deployed with a MySQL back end.
If the user logs in and there is no quota set for them in table 'quota',
the system will automatically inset a line
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:09:33 Bob Eastbrook wrote:
Can anyone describe an architecture which can handle 1000 IMAP or POP
messages per second? Ideally, it would be hosted in the cloud and
additional instances could be launched to handle additional load.
Bob
The Courier IMAP server is a fast,
I would a method for Dovecot to recalculate the quota usage and rewrite it to
the quota DB (Called on demand by a non-Dovecot POP3 daemon)
I don't want the line deleted in the DB as this would only recalculate next
time the Dovecot LDA or IMAP handles a message, and I want to keep the data
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:43:07 Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 3.1.2010, at 6.26, Jerry wrote:
(Now
could be a good time to try to get me to come somewhere I've always
wanted to go. :)
Where exactly would that be? I worked for years in New York City, and
except for the occasional terror
addresses, and never anything more arbitrary.
Has anyone found a way around this?
Michael
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:49:26 you wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 12:12 +1300, Michael wrote:
How do I get IMAP+POP3 vs. LDA to use different user_query statements?
Like Kirill said, you can use %s for it. But sure, it'll make the query
bigger and uglier. Hopefully I'll manage to make v2.0
Zitat von Alan McGinlay - SICS al...@sics.se
Hi,
Two things:
1. Does anyone know of a good PPA with updated packages of Dovecot
for Ubuntu? For the latest Dovecot for latest Ubuntu LTS see Xiaoka
APT Repository. (Outdated. Could someone provide a ppa for latest
stable Dovecot, please?)
{
pattern = priv/quota/storage
table = quota
username_field = username
value_field = bytes
}
map {
pattern = priv/quota/messages
table = quota
username_field = username
value_field = messages
}
Can this be fixed?
Michael
IPV6 support.
Michael Hallager
?
p@rick
Yes - put your Dovecot on a dedicated IP address and set a Policyd
quota limit based on user IP address. Only option I am aware of to
granulate to port level is IP tables (or comparable FW)
Cheers,
Michael Hallager
On 2013-12-30 22:53, Benny Pedersen wrote:
michael skrev den 2013-12-30 02:35:
www.policyd.org
You'll need to use v2.1 to get IPV6 support.
incorrect, policyd v1 still supports ipv6 greylistning, but it cant
be used as a ipv6 server from postfix is another problem
same holds water
to sync also all ACL lists and sieve scripts?
Is using dsync the right way for my purpose?
Thanks,
Michael
[1] http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Dsync
Quoting Steffen Kaiser skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Michael wrote:
I'm planning to move all mailboxes from a Dovecot 2.2.10 server to a
Dovecot 2.2.9 server. Dovecot is serving virtual users only.
you downgrade?
Yes, because I'm switching from CentOS 6.5 to Ubuntu
Quoting Steffen Kaiser skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, Michael wrote:
Quoting Steffen Kaiser skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de:
do you change the storage as well? Or: why not transfer the mailboxes,
ACLs, scripts etc.pp. on file system level, e.g. using rsync?
On the new
Quoting Philipp Faeustlin philipp.faeust...@uni-hohenheim.de:
Am 27.08.2014 um 13:23 schrieb Michael:
Quoting Steffen Kaiser skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Michael wrote:
I'm planning to move all mailboxes from a Dovecot 2.2.10 server to a
Dovecot 2.2.9 server
Quoting Philipp Faeustlin philipp.faeust...@uni-hohenheim.de:
Am 27.08.2014 um 14:52 schrieb Michael:
I've already been aware of this web site. I saw that they offer only
packages for Ubuntu 12.04. I'm Using Ubuntu 14.04. I know that often
it's not a problem to take packages from another
Quoting Jiri Bourek bou...@thinline.cz:
On 27.8.2014 15:25, Michael wrote:
Quoting Philipp Faeustlin philipp.faeust...@uni-hohenheim.de:
Am 27.08.2014 um 14:52 schrieb Michael:
I've already been aware of this web site. I saw that they offer only
packages for Ubuntu 12.04. I'm Using
:
file_dotlock_open(/var/mail/vhosts/domain.at/michael/.dovecot.lda-dupes)
failed: No such file or directory
Sep 2 13:31:27 mx0 dovecot: lmtp(16248, sv_bog...@neurohr.at): Error:
file_dotlock_open(/var/mail/vhosts/domain.at/michael/.dovecot.lda-dupes)
failed: No such file or directory
So
Quoting Alex JOST jost+li...@dimejo.at:
Am 02.09.2014 um 15:59 schrieb Michael:
Hi,
I just moved the dovecot maildir location for all virtual users to
another location.
I moved everything from
/var/mail/vhosts/%d/%n
to
/var/vmail/%d/%n/maildir
Everything seem to be fine except of one
:4190 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
0 515675 20540/dovecot
Would did I not get here?
Thanks,
--
Regards,
Michael
https://skrilnetz.net
binj17F_q8kuH.bin
Description: PGP Public Key
incoming mails cause this or do I have maybe a bugged mail in my
original mailbox that is causing my trouble?
Any hint is appreciated.
Thanks,
Michael
to the new one or is it just not recommended to sync them over-and-over
again in such a setup via imapc or is it better to sync them only once?
Any hint/pointing me to the right solution is greatly appreciated.
Michael
Hello,
Am 11-02-2016 14:56, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
I finally wrote this:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/ConfigFile
Looks like it ended up having a lot more content than I initially
assumed.
You are my hero ;)
On Monday, December 23, 2019 11:22:27 AM CET, Sami Ketola wrote:
change your configuration to use some more optimized mailbox
format and configure postfix to deliver over dovecot-lda or
lmtp.
or, since you already use doveadm, tell dovecot to index your mailbox
manually before your 'doveadm
On Monday, December 23, 2019 11:22:27 AM CET, Sami Ketola wrote:
change your configuration to use some more optimized mailbox
format and configure postfix to deliver over dovecot-lda or
lmtp.
or, since you already use doveadm, tell dovecot to index your mailbox
manually before your 'doveadm
On Monday, December 23, 2019 11:22:27 AM CET, Sami Ketola wrote:
change your configuration to use some more optimized mailbox
format and configure postfix to deliver over dovecot-lda or
lmtp.
or, since you already use doveadm, tell dovecot to index your mailbox
manually before your 'doveadm
On Monday, December 23, 2019 11:22:27 AM CET, Sami Ketola wrote:
change your configuration to use some more optimized mailbox
format and configure postfix to deliver over dovecot-lda or
lmtp.
or, since you already use doveadm, tell dovecot to index your mailbox
manually before your 'doveadm
On Monday, December 23, 2019 11:22:27 AM CET, Sami Ketola wrote:
change your configuration to use some more optimized mailbox
format and configure postfix to deliver over dovecot-lda or
lmtp.
or, since you already use doveadm, tell dovecot to index your mailbox
manually before your 'doveadm
hey,
just one minor thing:
if there's any time left, please change
in the repository
debian/buster
in the package
dovecot-core
in the file
/lib/systemd/system/dovecot.service
the line
PIDFile=/var/run/dovecot/master.pid
to
PIDFile=/run/dovecot/master.pid
because systemd always shows
send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
-
hey,
i am considering changing my mailbox format from maildir to mdbox. the
reason for this is mainly, b/c i have (a) multiple large mailboxes with
tens of thousands of mail files, and (b) most of these mails files have a
size significantly smaller than the sector size of the disk.
so,
First of all, feature request:
doveconf -d
show the default value of all settings
On 01/16/12 17:41, Don Buchholz wrote:
The 'doveconf -n' output is attached. I have not set any
process_limit values, and I don't think I'm getting anywhere close to
the 1024 default, so I'm pretty
On 01/17/12 09:31, Duane Hill wrote:
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 at 14:23:47 UTC, mich...@orlitzky.com
confabulated:
First of all, feature request:
doveconf -d
show the default value of all settings
You mean like doveconf(1) ?
OPTIONS
-a Show all settings with
On 01/17/12 09:58, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Using -a shows you all settings, as they're running in your
installation. That's the defaults, except where they're overwritten by
your config.
I was asking for the defaults regardless of what's in my config file, so
that I don't have to deduce
On 01/17/12 13:15, Don Buchholz wrote:
What makes me think 1024 is the default?
The documentation:
--
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Services?highlight=%28process_limit%29#imap.2C_pop3.2C_managesieve
That's only for those three services (imap, pop3, managesieve), not for
imap-login
On 01/17/12 14:02, Don Buchholz wrote:
But, Michael's right, documentation can be wrong. So, I dumped the
entire configuration. Here are the values found on the running system.
Both imap and pop3 services have process_limit = 1024.
You probably just posted this while my last message was
On 01/17/12 14:48, Don Buchholz wrote:
Doh! Thanks, Michael. I wasn't looking at the original error message
closely enough. I scanned too quickly and saw service(imap) and not
service(imap-login). Now the failure when there are only ~200 (total)
dovecot processes makes sense (because
I'm using
$ /usr/sbin/dovecot --version
2.0.15
on
$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
and version 8 of Thunderbird.
I use dovecot locally for internal only access to my email archives, of which I
have many gigs of email archives. Over time I end up subscribing to a couple
/dovecot.index reset, view is now
inconsistent
dovecot: imap(user1): Error:
/home/dovecot/user1/mailboxes/INBOX/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index reset, view is now
inconsistent
This is on dovecot 2.1rc5.
-Michael
Hi Timo,
On 12-Feb-12 5:16, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 10.2.2012, at 14.13, Michael Stilkerich wrote:
I have shared one of my mailboxes to another user providing him full rights to
that mailbox.
$ doveadm acl get -u user1 doc
Is doc the namespace prefix?
No, 'doc' is the name of the shared
On 12-Feb-12 18:17, Timo Sirainen wrote:
This should fix all your problems:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/ccad37bc242f
Thanks Timo, it does :)
-Michael
syncing running?
Any hint, help is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Michael
Hi --
On 18.02.2012, at 19:26, Michael Grimm wrote:
Today, I did upgrade one server to 2.1, and doveadm sync is throwing to
following error:
mail doveadm sync -f -u test ssh vm...@remote-host.tld dsync -v -f -u test
doveadm(test): Fatal: All your namespaces have a location setting
Hi --
On 21.02.2012, at 02:02, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.2.2012, at 20.26, Michael Grimm wrote:
doveadm(test): Fatal: All your namespaces have a location setting. It should
be empty (default mail_location) in the namespace to be converted.
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev
Hi --
On 21.02.2012, at 21:52, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.2.2012, at 19.29, Michael Grimm wrote:
doveadm(test): Fatal: All your namespaces have a location setting. It
should be empty (default mail_location) in the namespace to be converted.
Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev
Hi --
On 21.02.2012, at 22:57, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 21.2.2012, at 23.48, Michael Grimm wrote:
But, now I do end with a message like ...
vmail dsync -v -f -u test mirror ssh vm...@remote-host.tld dsync -v -f
-u test
usage: dsync [-C alt char] [-m mailbox] [-u user] [-frRv
Hi --
On 21.02.2012, at 23:03, Michael Grimm wrote:
On 21.02.2012, at 22:57, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Probably intentional. Even if it didn't give that error message, it would
fail because v2.0 and v2.1 uses a slightly different protocol (I thought
about making it backwards compatible
with dsync 2.1.x
regarding reappearing, thus indelible mail?
Regards,
Michael
I need some help with the dovecot configuration. I want to remove
downloaded messages from Mail Server once the messages have been
successfully downloaded by pop3-clients, even when the clients have been
configured to save copy of messages in the Server.
timo is quite correct -- consider
Hi --
On 27.02.2012, at 13:45, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 20:55 +0100, Michael Grimm wrote:
My working 2.0.18 syntax threw the following error:
vmail dsync -v -f -u test ssh vm...@remote-host.tld dsync -v -f -u test
doveadm(vmail): Fatal: Unknown print formatter
Hi --
On 03.03.2012, at 19:03, Michael Grimm wrote:
Thus I can't test user suggestion.
s/user/your/
Sorry,
Michael
Hi --
On 28.02.2012, at 15:03, Timo Sirainen wrote:
This document describes a design for a dsync-replicated Dovecot cluster.
Whow! That's more than interesting, that's a real bummer ;-) At least for
my setup of redundant mail servers.
Looking forward to test it,
Michael
Hi --
On 04.03.2012, at 12:05, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 3.3.2012, at 20.03, Michael Grimm wrote:
vmail dsync -v -f -u test mirror ssh vm...@remote-host.tld dsync -v -f
-u test
dsync-local(test): Error: remote: dsync: illegal option -- f
doveadm dsync-server [-u user|-A] [-S
that be possible with the current implementation?
Regards,
Michael
Hi --
On 04.03.2012, at 12:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.3.2012, at 13.31, Michael Grimm wrote:
That doesn't work in my ssh setup, because I'm using a different ssh port
and thus have to run:
ssh -p 1234 vm...@remote-host.tld
Sorry, I should have mentioned that before.
In your
Hi --
On 04.03.2012, at 12:38, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.3.2012, at 13.34, Michael Grimm wrote:
On 04.03.2012, at 11:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
In dovecot-2.1 hg you can now test dsync-based replication.
Great news. I would love to test it, if I will be able to run this on a test
account
HI --
On 05.03.2012 10:56, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.3.2012, at 13.54, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 4.3.2012, at 13.41, Michael Grimm wrote:
By undeletable do you mean you have mails that always come back
after expunging them?
Yes. Deleting by the client will return them after the next dsync
from my
point of view for my
conditions (handful users, average workload of roughly 1000
mails a day).
Thank you for replicator and regards,
Michael
[1] JFTR: I did similar tests in the past with dsync running from cron
every other minute
with similar results.
Hi --
On 08.03.2012 12:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 11:26 +0100, Michael Grimm wrote:
You can do for example:
service config {
unix_listener config {
user = vmail
}
}
I will try that later.
It seems to me, that whenever a larger number of mails arrive on
both
priorities at all :-(
Regards,
Michael
Hi -
On 14.03.2012, at 22:14, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 14.3.2012, at 22.36, Michael Grimm wrote:
And spammers don't care about mx priorities at all :-(
But spams go to spam mailbox where duplicates don't really matter. :)
True ;-) But spam mails might interfere with syncing of legitimate
Hi --
On 14.03.2012, at 22:26, Michael Grimm wrote:
But spam mails might interfere with syncing of legitimate
mail arriving at the same time.
Forget about that part, I was wrong because duplicates are
produced in corresponding mailboxes, only.
Sorry for the noise,
Michael
such clusterfs an overkill. Well, my servers do
reside in the same housing building, thus it could be done without
performance loss. But a scenario of worldwide distributed mail servers
desires a dsync/replicator scheme, IMHO ;-)
Regards,
Michael
Hi --
On 15.03.2012 12:21, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-14 5:51 PM, Michael Grimm trash...@odo.in-berlin.de
wrote:
You misunderstood. I was referring to system cronjob's mail reports
from cron.daily jobs like security reports et al. Those reports
normally run at identical times
Hi --
On 15.03.2012 15:04, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-15 9:46 AM, Michael Grimm trash...@odo.in-berlin.de
wrote:
Thus, at 3:01 one report from mx1 will be delivered at mx1 into
mailfolder
REPORTS and at 3:01 one report from mx2 will be delivered at mx2
into the
mailfolder REPORTS
#
mail_replica = remote:vmail@server1.domain
# run full synchronization mode every other hour
# (default is every 24 hours)
#
replication_full_sync_interval = 1 hours
}
HTH,
Michael
choose to run device doveadm as user
vmail like I do.
service config {
# needed to grant access to /var/run/dovecot/config for service
doveadm
#
unix_listener config {
user = vmail
}
}
Regards,
Michael
server
failed: EOF
That's an error due to not finding doveadm at the remote site.
Regards,
Michael
understand the idea behind it.
As my main problem is that EVERYTHING (that gets created on
different servers in the same time) gets duplicated.
As Timo recommended already, you better upgrade to 2.1.2 first. I can
confirm that he fixed a lot compared to older dsync versions.
Regards,
Michael
Hi --
On 15.03.2012 22:05, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 15.3.2012, at 22.48, Michael Grimm wrote:
Actually it's a bad idea to use root for ssh from a security point
of view. A hacked root account isn't fun. Thus, normally one needs
to explicitly change the config of the sshd daemon to allow root
worked fine. The SSL certifcate is also correct.
Any hints are welcome to identify the problem. Thanks in advance.
Beste wishes
Michael
The problem starts just after authorization:
Console:
###
openssl s_client -connect mailserver.com:993
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE
IDLE AUTH=PLAIN] Dovecot ready.
a login username
And what happens without SSL? e.g. telnet localhost 143
Without SSL it is no problem:
##
telnet imap-server 143
Trying xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx...
Connected to imap-server.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS
I just upgraded my servers from Dovecot 2.1.2 to Dovecot 2.1.3-0~auto+5 by using
Debian binaries from http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ stable-auto/dovecot-2.1
main.
So what exactly is this version? dovecot --version?
At the moment the version is 2.1.3-0~auto+6 from rename-it.nl.
dovecot -n:
I just did some more tests with different binaries.
The problem occurs since:
Dovecot 2.1.3-0~auto+5
dovecot --version
2.1.3 (f30437ed63dc)
Dovecot 2.1.3-0~auto+4 works fine
dovecot --version
2.1.3 (ff5c341f8838)
So my title is wrong. The problem only affects people
who like to live on the
Apple isn't the best program ;-)
Regards, Michael
Nothing to do with Dovecot, but I figured this is the best place to ask.
Do any of the newer versions of Outlook have proper identities support
like Thunderbird, mutt, Roundcube, i.e. every other mail client on Earth?
We have customers who set up ten different mailboxes for one person
because
On 04/13/12 02:22, Birta Levente wrote:
Outlook (2003, 2007) does do this if you set up different mail accounts,
but we shouldn't have to do that.
Control Panel / E-mail (Mail in win7) / Profiles ...
I hope this help you
This is more work than setting up multiple accounts =)
On 04/13/12 02:35, Robert Schetterer wrote:
you can do it with exchange,
no wonder outlook isnt a internet mail client in first line
its the client of exchange, so people should use real internet mail
clients ( TB etc ), if m$ would more be compatible, the need of exchange
may more less ,
1 - 100 of 1044 matches
Mail list logo
