* Tom Hendrikx via dovecot:
> Or in readable sieve: [...]
Do you mean to imply that regular expressions are not readable? ;-) All
it takes is a little practice. Besides, regex are more efficient. It is
well worth learning about them, and regex are really not as bad as some
make them out to be.
* Lev Serebryakov:
> I need to match all messages sent from some specific domain and all
> its sub-domains.
I prefer using regular expressions for this kind of tests:
if address :regex "From" "[@.]example\.(com|org)$" {...}
This will match all addresses for example.com, example.org and their
* Michael Grant via dovecot:
> If I have a user in /etc/passwd, for example 'joe' and a user in
> /etc/dovecot/users, j...@example.org, and both of these users are in
> fact the same user but different password. They use the same inbox
> and the same mail files.
Do these two share a single user
* Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
> I updated the settings a bit on the server as well. Maybe it works
> better now?
Yes, it does indeed:
Sep 7 19:33:23 ra postfix/smtp[14429]: Trusted TLS connection established to
talvi.dovecot.org[2a04:3545:1000:720:acc1:5bff:fe5e:459]:25: TLSv1.3 with
cipher
* Marc Schiffbauer via dovecot:
> Wild guess: you need to explicitely allow for example DEFAULT@SECLEVEL=0
> ciphersuite in postfix to make *your* openssl accept this remote sslv3
> connection
Thanks, Marc. I had thought about this, and have tried various Postfix
parameters related to TLS
Hello,
I cannot seem to send STARTTLS protected mail to talvi.dovecot.org, and
I was wondering if anybody else sees similar problems:
Sep 6 22:29:10 ra postfix/smtp[15748]: SSL_connect error to
talvi.dovecot.org[94.237.105.223]:25: -1
Sep 6 22:29:10 ra postfix/smtp[15748]: warning: TLS
* TWHG Technical via dovecot:
> I hope this is the right place to start.
Not really. What you are asking for (changing the default configuration
provided by Ubuntu) is something better asked of the Ubuntu package
maintainers, should they even agree with your assessment. They might
tell you that
* Tom Hendrikx via dovecot:
> There are nice tricks you can do with virtual alias maps and pcre
> within postfix to split email to specific user accounts, which could
> also accommodate other alias schemes than standard subaddressing (such
> as yours).
Postfix supports sub-addressing out of the
* Robert via dovecot:
> We use a simple system for routing emails to different email users by
> postfixing the addresses with the actual user: xxxJohn@domain;
> yyyJohn@domain etc all will be delivered to user John.
> (This way John can invent a new email address on-the-fly and that will
> be
* Thomas Güttler via dovecot:
> https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines#regex-are-great---but-its-like-eating-rubbish
Thanks for including the disclaimer "It's my personal opinion and
feeling. No facts, no single truth." in your 'guidelines' (many of which
I disagree with). I just wish
* Thomas Güttler via dovecot:
> Most people use http based APIs today.
And what makes you think that? Who is "most people", exactly? From my
experience over the last 35 years in the business, there is no clear
indication that HTTP-based APIs will dominate in the future. SMTP and
IMAP have been
* Thomas Güttler via dovecot:
> Stateless, http and URLs are the future.
A bold claim, and not worth anything without proof, which is impossible
to provide because you cannot predict the future.
> JavaScript running on in browser or mobile phone can't connect to
> IMAP/SMTP.
That's simply not
* Steve Litt via dovecot:
> Anyone know of such a file manager or browser for IMAP?
If by "file" you mean "mail": Every IMAP capable MUA.
-Ralph
* Odhiambo Washington via dovecot:
> Is it possible? How do I do it for ALL mailboxes?
This has been asked (and answered) recently; see the Dovecot Wiki.
-Ralph
* Voytek Eymont via dovecot:
> or where is the extra 'c' from ?
> "Unknown column 'mailbox.enablesievec'"
sievec is just Pigeonhole's Sieve script compiler. Try "man sievec" in
a shell. I suggested you use it because sievec would report possible
errors in your sieve scripts.
I use script files
Looking at https://dovecot.org/mailman/options/dovecot I see that the
option "Set Reply-To header to list?" does not accept any changes from
me. I assume this might be related to DMARC related header mangling that
was discussed at length before. While I do not want to open that
particular can of
* Steven Smith via dovecot:
> I’m pretty sure it arises from some subtle dovecot configuration
> setting.
Based on your statement that Dovecot does not log connection attempts by
Notes.app, I am not sure this assumption is correct.
> Would you mind posting your `doveconf -n` so that we can
* Voytek Eymont via dovecot:
> what am I missing, how to check ?
Try runing "sievec -u {your_linux_user} /path/to/whatever.sieve" from a
shell and check the resulting error messages.
> postmaster_address = root
Any fully qualified address (postmas...@yourdomain.com seems like a
logical
* Steven Smith via dovecot:
> The issue is that macOS Note.app does not sync with this server.
I'm syncing macOS Mojave's Notes.app with Dovecot without problems, so
it can be done. Have you made sure that you activated both mail and
notes in macOS' Internet Accounts preferences for this
* David Mehler:
> Are there any performance or stability advantages Sdbox over Maildir?
Have you read the documentation at all?
-Ralph
* David Mehler via dovecot:
> Any help appreciated.
https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat
-Ralph
* Ed W. via dovecot:
> How would you generate scripts for some few thousand users? How would
> you maintain those thousands of scripts when you make changes to the
> template?
A dozen or a few thousand, it makes no difference in terms of the
mechanics involved. Templates and generator scripts
* Rodolfo Gonzalez via dovecot:
> I just have a doubt in the technical side: is it safe to have the
> email in EFS?
"Safe" as in "storing and retreiving will work"? Probably.
I would not do it for privacy reasons, unless all data was encrypted on
a machine before storing it in any service
* lty via dovecot:
> foxmail will not have next step after sending {LIST "" *} command
> action.
Can you please stop this now? If Foxmail is broken, Foxmail needs to be
fixed, not some kludges added to well-behaving Dovecot.
-Ralph
* Ed W. via dovecot:
> My goal is that users can set a user configurable setting (in an
> external front end) and if the email size is greater than this size
> then we will do some processing on it. This particular filter is
> actually in a global sieve filter.
A global script using per-user
* Kunal A. via dovecot:
> Error: mkdir(/var/vmail/ema...@example.com/Maildir) failed: Permission
> denied (euid=5000(vmail) egid=5000(vmail) missing +w perm: /var, dir owned
> by 0:0 mode=0755)
The error message seems pretty clear. User 'vmail' does not have write
permissions for /var, which is
* Juri Haberland via dovecot:
> Blindly enabling DMARC checks without thinking about the consequences
> for themselves should not be the problem of other well behaving
> participants.
Can you judge if DMARC is enabled "blindly"? No, I thought not. Also,
the issue was not on the receiving end,
27 matches
Mail list logo
