RE: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

2021-03-20 Thread dovecot
Aki Tuomi wrote: > Yeah. Outlook does APPEND+EXPUNGE instead of MOVE. That rather critical item should probably be mentioned in the configuration manual; in my searching about on the problem, I didn't find anything that indicated this Microsoft-caused limitation. On the upside, I'm glad I

RE: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

2021-03-20 Thread Aki Tuomi
> On 20/03/2021 20:30 dove...@steve.wattlink.net wrote: > > > Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > We provide this handy guide for teaching spam filters, see > > https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/antispam_with_sieve/ > > Yes, I followed that and am having trouble. I think (haven't yet

RE: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

2021-03-20 Thread dovecot
Aki Tuomi wrote: > We provide this handy guide for teaching spam filters, see > https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/antispam_with_sieve/ Yes, I followed that and am having trouble. I think (haven't yet confirmed through a protocol trace) that the problem is Outlook using APPEND

RE: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

2021-03-20 Thread Steve Watt
From: Gedalya Subject: Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all? On 3/20/21 7:37 AM, dove...@steve.wattlink.net <mailto:dove...@steve.wattlink.net> wrote: Greetings! I feel like this has been beaten to death, but my searches on the web (and about 10 hours spent over the la

Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

2021-03-20 Thread Michael Peddemors
On 2021-03-20 7:14 a.m., Justina Colmena ~biz wrote: Spam versus ham is not the only sort of classification I would want to do on large volumes of email -- I might want to have separate folders to automatically classify incoming messages into separate categories for, say, friends-and-family,

Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

2021-03-20 Thread Justina Colmena ~biz
I have not yet enabled imapsieve -- so far I have had fairly good luck avoiding spam simply by using SPF+DKIM+DMARC and enabling basic verification of incoming mail with opendkim and opendmarc. Lately I have been reading some books on "fuzzy logic" and "fuzzy sets" with quite serious

Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

2021-03-20 Thread Gedalya
On 3/20/21 7:37 AM, dove...@steve.wattlink.net wrote: > > plugin { > >   imapsieve_mailbox1_before = > file:/usr/local/etc/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve > >   imapsieve_mailbox1_causes = COPY APPEND > >   imapsieve_mailbox1_name = Spam > >   imapsieve_mailbox2_before = >

Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

2021-03-20 Thread Gedalya
On 3/20/21 10:54 AM, Steve Watt wrote: > I thought I had enabled that – check out the doveconf -n listing.  Did I miss > something? IMAP METADATA for user-defined imapsieve scripts would be useful to you if you have clients that support that. If you know of any, please do share. > Mar 19

Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

2021-03-20 Thread Aki Tuomi
> On 20/03/2021 05:55 Gedalya wrote: > > > On 3/20/21 7:37 AM, dove...@steve.wattlink.net wrote: > > > plugin { > > imapsieve_mailbox1_before = > > file:/usr/local/etc/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve > > imapsieve_mailbox1_causes = COPY APPEND > > imapsieve_mailbox1_name = Spam > >

Re: FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

2021-03-20 Thread Gedalya
On 3/20/21 7:37 AM, dove...@steve.wattlink.net wrote: > > Greetings! > >   > > I feel like this has been beaten to death, but my searches on the web (and > about 10 hours spent over the last two days) haven’t revealed what’s going on. > >   > > Basically, it’s the usual “I’d like to auto-learn

FW: imapsieve rules not matching at all?

2021-03-19 Thread dovecot
Greetings! I feel like this has been beaten to death, but my searches on the web (and about 10 hours spent over the last two days) haven't revealed what's going on. Basically, it's the usual "I'd like to auto-learn spam/ham based on moves to/from a folder" problem. But in my debugging, I