Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client
http://www.trojita.flaska.net/
I also use
http://opendkim.org/
http://www.trusteddomain.org/opendmarc/
as milters on Postfix
Active development, I'm sure they could all use some help, or forks for
alternatives, I don't know, I'm not involved in
On 2022-10-11 14:05, Benny Pedersen wrote:
hi@zakaria.website skrev den 2022-10-11 13:42:
On 2022-09-13 13:10, Benny Pedersen wrote:
hi@zakaria.website skrev den 2022-09-13 14:03:
from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:
On 10/11/22 07:42, hi@zakaria.website wrote:
Another update yet with a solution.
I found the causing issue with DKIM and DMARC failure when a signed
email pass through mailing list such as dovecot as I expected, it has
nothing to do with the mailing list but it's to do with DKIM signing
hi@zakaria.website skrev den 2022-10-11 13:42:
On 2022-09-13 13:10, Benny Pedersen wrote:
hi@zakaria.website skrev den 2022-09-13 14:03:
from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:
mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
On 2022-09-13 13:10, Benny Pedersen wrote:
hi@zakaria.website skrev den 2022-09-13 14:03:
least to must pass Signature Verification. Have anyone managed to
configure EXIM to verify more than one DKIM Signature header?
postfix smtpd_milter_maps with a list of ips that is known maillists
ips
hi@zakaria.website skrev den 2022-09-13 14:03:
least to must pass Signature Verification. Have anyone managed to
configure EXIM to verify more than one DKIM Signature header?
postfix smtpd_milter_maps with a list of ips that is known maillists ips
is best for software that are brokken, use
On 2022 Feb 16, at 10:22, Chris Bennett
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 12:58:03PM +0100, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
>> Thats a TLD ban. Meaning *.ru is banned.
>>
>> same applies for my domain for example, I ban *.xyz, *.date and a few others.
> I don't understand at all why banning tld is
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 12:58:03PM +0100, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> Thats a TLD ban. Meaning *.ru is banned.
>
> same applies for my domain for example, I ban *.xyz, *.date and a few others.
>
I don't understand at all why banning tld is reasonable.
I'm not rich. I buy .rocks and .xyz
.rocks
>
> Google's corporate web page, Alphabet, Inc., is on the ".xyz" top level
> domain.
>
> * https://abc.xyz/
>
Google is probably to most fined company of all mentioned on this list,
breaking countless laws over decades. That is the company you have as
reference?
ped a woman from using "design." From: sebast...@sebbe.euSent: February 12, 2022 5:25 AMTo: dovecot@dovecot.orgSubject: Sv: Sv: Sv: dovecot mailing list (this mailing list), DKIM, SPF and DMARC Yep. Its a lot of TLDs that is banned at me,
Google's corporate web page, Alphabet, Inc., is on the ".xyz" top level domain.
* https://abc.xyz/
I suppose Sergey Brin is Russian as well, so what have you there?
Perhaps you have inadvertently confused ".xyz" with the ".xxx" TLD. The popular
grade school acronym for "eXamine Your Zipper" is
On 2022-02-12 12:58, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
Thats a TLD ban. Meaning *.ru is banned.
ru tld is not this time
same applies for my domain for example, I ban *.xyz, *.date and a few
others.
why ban tld ?
: host spam1.roosit.eu[212.26.193.45] said: 553
5.3.0
lets see
>
> (sorry for posting to list this, but I don't have any ways to contact
> Marc off-list now)
>
> >>
> >>Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these are
> >> false positives and I'm afraid, that it could lower reputation of my
> mail
> >> server IP address with
@dovecot.org
Ämne: Re: Sv: Sv: dovecot mailing list (this mailing list), DKIM, SPF and DMARC
The ".top" TLD is popular among Russian spammers, ".ru" is a little too obvious
and honest for what it is, unless that's part of Biden's sanctions, the others
you mention look like vice
*.xyz, *.date and a few others.
>
>-Ursprungligt meddelande-
>Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Lev
>Serebryakov
>Skickat: den 12 februari 2022 12:08
>Till: dovecot@dovecot.org
>Ämne: Re: Sv: dovecot mailing list (this mailing list), DKIM, SPF and DMARC
>
>On 11.
mailing list (this mailing list), DKIM, SPF and DMARC
On 11.02.2022 16:31, Marc wrote:
(sorry for posting to list this, but I don't have any ways to contact Marc
off-list now)
>>
>>Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these
>> are false positi
On 11.02.2022 16:31, Marc wrote:
(sorry for posting to list this, but I don't have any ways to contact Marc
off-list now)
Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these are
false positives and I'm afraid, that it could lower reputation of my mail
server IP address with
On 11.02.2022 16:31, Marc wrote:
Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these are
false positives and I'm afraid, that it could lower reputation of my mail
server IP address with major providers (like Google Mail).
How can you get a lower reputation? Afaik dmarc is
On 2022-02-11 16:27, Marc wrote:
wait for spamassassin 4, gmail does not let users change there missing
problems with no dnssec domains, how can google be serius there ?
google is only to be taken serious with acquiring new clients, if they
would take email serious they would eg spend money on
On 2022-02-11 14:31, Marc wrote:
How can you get a lower reputation? Afaik dmarc is just signing your
outgoing messages.
there is no repution in dmarc, it either pass or fail, if all fails, it
proves nothing, if all pass it proves just a litte that is not forged
content
maillist should
> wait for spamassassin 4, gmail does not let users change there missing
> problems with no dnssec domains, how can google be serius there ?
google is only to be taken serious with acquiring new clients, if they would
take email serious they would eg spend money on filtering their out going spam
On 2022-02-11 12:29, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
On 09.02.2022 16:33, Aki Tuomi wrote:
I'm participating in ~20 mailing lists and only this one gives a
storm of DMARC reports on each my posting.
+1
Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these are
false positives and I'm
>
> Problem is, I need to unpack each of them to be sure, that these are
> false positives and I'm afraid, that it could lower reputation of my mail
> server IP address with major providers (like Google Mail).
>
How can you get a lower reputation? Afaik dmarc is just signing your outgoing
signature fails.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Lev
Serebryakov
Skickat: den 4 februari 2022 21:58
Till: dovecot@dovecot.org
Ämne: dovecot mailing list (this mailing list), DKIM, SPF and DMARC
My domain (serebrtyajov.spb.ru) has all these "new&qu
On 2022-02-10, dove...@ptld.com wrote:
> It is possible for a mailing list to pass DMARC verification, but
> there doesn't seem to be a lot of motivation to put in the extra effort
> to make it work.
It is possible, but it breaks how many people expect mailing lists to work.
> when dkim pass there is no breakage, but dkim fail can lead to in some setups
> to make reject, even for maillists
> that is a design fail on dkim
I disagree. DKIM is doing its job. It is a design fail on the part of most
mailing list and/or lack of user's DKIM signatures.
Look at it
On 2022-02-09 17:25, Julien Salort wrote:
Le 09/02/2022 à 16:55, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
hope maillist users turn there dkim signers into sign only, not verify
aswell, verify must only happen in dmarc
I am a little bit confused.
- why not verify dkim ? It seems fine for your message. I
Le 09/02/2022 à 16:55, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
hope maillist users turn there dkim signers into sign only, not verify
aswell, verify must only happen in dmarc
I am a little bit confused.
- why not verify dkim ? It seems fine for your message. I get:
Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom)
Google, Yahoo and Microsoft, the big providers all use ARC, and have used it
for years. But Wikipedia doesn't have much nice to say about it.
--> allows a receiving service to validate an email when the email's SPF and
DKIM records are rendered invalid by an intermediate server's processing.
On 2022-02-09 16:16, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2022-02-09 14:33, Aki Tuomi wrote:
We did that replacement for a while, but people complained. We have
ARC signing there, unfortunately it only works if you trust it.
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; talvi.dovecot.org;
dkim=pass
On 2022-02-09 14:33, Aki Tuomi wrote:
We did that replacement for a while, but people complained. We have
ARC signing there, unfortunately it only works if you trust it.
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; talvi.dovecot.org;
dkim=pass header.d=open-xchange.com header.s=201705 header.b=kWkbHwXq;
On February 4, 2022 11:56:53 AM AKST, Lev Serebryakov
wrote:
> After that I've got several DMARC reports about "spam" from my domain. All
> these reports are about my mailing list post.
>
Interesting. That's exactly how DMARC is supposed to work with reporting
enabled. So you've got that
.
>
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Lev
> Serebryakov
> Skickat: den 4 februari 2022 21:58
> Till: dovecot@dovecot.org
> Ämne: dovecot mailing list (this mailing list), DKIM, SPF and DMARC
>
>
> My domain (serebr
mailing lists
sometimes change or reencode content so DKIM signature fails.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Lev
Serebryakov
Skickat: den 4 februari 2022 21:58
Till: dovecot@dovecot.org
Ämne: dovecot mailing list (this mailing list), DKIM, SPF and DMARC
My
My domain (serebrtyajov.spb.ru) has all these "new" e-mail technologies
configured. It works fine till I write to this mailing list.
After that I've got several DMARC reports about "spam" from my domain. All
these reports are about my mailing list post.
I don't have such problems with
35 matches
Mail list logo
