Re: Assertion during dsync receive

2018-03-13 Thread Tanstaafl
On Tue Mar 13 2018 08:12:29 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 13.03.2018 14:10, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Yes... per folder? Or per user? > Sorry, ment per folder. =) Heh, no worries, ok, thanks, nothing to worry about so much then.

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

2018-03-13 Thread Aki Tuomi
On 13.03.2018 14:10, Tanstaafl wrote: > On Tue Mar 13 2018 07:42:31 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi > wrote: >>> Is this index file kept on a per *folder* basis? Or per user/account? >> Yes > Yes... per folder? Or per user? Sorry, ment per folder. =) >>> If it

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

2018-03-13 Thread Tanstaafl
On Tue Mar 13 2018 07:42:31 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi wrote: >> Is this index file kept on a per *folder* basis? Or per user/account? > Yes Yes... per folder? Or per user? >> If it is per folder, then it is much less of a problem, and could be >> worked

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

2018-03-13 Thread Aki Tuomi
On 13.03.2018 13:40, Tanstaafl wrote: > On Sat Feb 24 2018 11:32:05 GMT-0500 (Eastern Daylight Time), Aki Tuomi > wrote: >>> On 23 February 2018 at 23:12 Tanstaafl wrote: >>> Ok, so, I'm still unclear... >>> >>> what cache are we talking about?

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

2018-03-13 Thread Tanstaafl
On Sat Feb 24 2018 11:32:05 GMT-0500 (Eastern Daylight Time), Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 23 February 2018 at 23:12 Tanstaafl wrote: >> Ok, so, I'm still unclear... >> >> what cache are we talking about? Are you saying that there is a limit to >> how

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

2018-02-24 Thread Aki Tuomi
> On 23 February 2018 at 23:12 Tanstaafl wrote: > > > On Fri Feb 23 2018 14:53:53 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi > wrote: > > It is problem for any mailbox > > Ok, so, I'm still unclear... > > what cache are we talking about? Are

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

2018-02-23 Thread Tanstaafl
On Fri Feb 23 2018 14:53:53 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi wrote: > It is problem for any mailbox Ok, so, I'm still unclear... what cache are we talking about? Are you saying that there is a limit to how many emails dovecot can store in a single... 'folder'?

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

2018-02-23 Thread Aki Tuomi
It is problem for any mailbox ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy Original message From: Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> Date: 23/02/2018 21:36 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Re: Assertion during dsync receive On Fri Feb 23 2018 13:53:27 GMT-0500 (Eastern St

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

2018-02-23 Thread Tanstaafl
On Fri Feb 23 2018 13:53:27 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Aki Tuomi wrote: > Once you cache grows bigger than 0x400 you have problems This is for a single mailbox? IS this only a problem for mbox and maybe sdbox?

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

2018-02-23 Thread Aki Tuomi
Once you cache grows bigger than 0x400 you have problems ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy Original message From: Ian Bobbitt <ibobb...@globalnoc.iu.edu> Date: 23/02/2018 20:33 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Re: Assertion during dsync receive Thanks. I'

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

2018-02-23 Thread Ian Bobbitt
Thanks. I've had the user clear out that mailbox, and replication is working fine for them again. Is there a better way to catch this than watch for crashes and read the backtrace to find what mailbox needs to be shrunk? Where is the threshold for "too big"? -- Ian On 2/23/18 11:33 AM, Aki

Re: Assertion during dsync receive

2018-02-23 Thread Aki Tuomi
The mailbox is too big. ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy Original message From: Ian Bobbitt Date: 23/02/2018 17:52 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: Assertion during dsync receive Hi, I'm getting an assertion failed on the receiving side,