Hello,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 03:08:40PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > Also, shouldn't this be keyed by the drm device?
>
> It could have that too, or it could come later. Fun with GPUs that it not
> only could be keyed by the device, but also by the type of the GPU engine.
> (Which are a)
On 21/07/2023 23:20, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 12:19:32PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:46:03PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
+ drm.active_us
+ GPU time used by the group recursively including all child groups.
Maybe instead add drm.stat and have
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 12:19:32PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:46:03PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > + drm.active_us
> > + GPU time used by the group recursively including all child groups.
>
> Maybe instead add drm.stat and have "usage_usec" inside? That'd be more
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:46:03PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> + drm.active_us
> + GPU time used by the group recursively including all child groups.
Maybe instead add drm.stat and have "usage_usec" inside? That'd be more
consistent with cpu side.
Thanks.
--
tejun
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
To support container use cases where external orchestrators want to make
deployment and migration decisions based on GPU load and capacity, we can
expose the GPU load as seen by the controller in a new drm.active_us
field. This field contains a monotonic cumulative time
