On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:12 PM Easwar Hariharan
wrote:
>
> On 5/8/2024 7:53 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 2:32 PM Easwar Hariharan
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/3/2024 11:13 AM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> >>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced
> >>>
On 5/8/2024 7:53 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 2:32 PM Easwar Hariharan
> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/3/2024 11:13 AM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 2:32 PM Easwar Hariharan
wrote:
>
> On 5/3/2024 11:13 AM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> > I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> > with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
> > series to fix drivers/i2c/[1],
On 5/3/2024 11:13 AM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
> I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
in the
