On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 4:26 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
> So I guess I'd say that I ended up being pretty happy with the
> "context" even if it does feel a little over engineered and I'd argue
> to keep it that way. That being said, if you feel strongly about it
> then we can perhaps get others to
On Wed, 1 May 2024 at 18:49, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 8:39 AM Jani Nikula
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:38 AM Neil Armstrong
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +/**
> > >> > + * struct
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 8:39 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:38 AM Neil Armstrong
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > +/**
> >> > + * struct mipi_dsi_multi_context - Context to call multiple MIPI DSI
> >> > funcs in a row
>
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:38 AM Neil Armstrong
> wrote:
>>
>> > +/**
>> > + * struct mipi_dsi_multi_context - Context to call multiple MIPI DSI
>> > funcs in a row
>> > + * @dsi: Pointer to the MIPI DSI device
>> > + * @accum_err: Storage for
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:38 AM Neil Armstrong
wrote:
>
> > +/**
> > + * struct mipi_dsi_multi_context - Context to call multiple MIPI DSI funcs
> > in a row
> > + * @dsi: Pointer to the MIPI DSI device
> > + * @accum_err: Storage for the accumulated error over the multiple calls.
> > Init
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:33 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > ---
> > Right now this patch introduces two new functions in
> > drm_mipi_dsi.c. Alternatively we could have changed the prototype of
> > the "chatty" functions and made the deprecated macros adapt to the new
> > prototype. While
Hello Mister Anderson,
On 27/04/2024 01:58, Douglas Anderson wrote:
The current mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() macros are non-intutitive because
they contain a hidden "return" statement that will return out of the
_caller_ of the macro. Let's mark them as deprecated and instead
introduce some new
Hi Douglas.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 04:58:37PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The current mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() macros are non-intutitive because
> they contain a hidden "return" statement that will return out of the
> _caller_ of the macro. Let's mark them as deprecated and instead
>
The current mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() macros are non-intutitive because
they contain a hidden "return" statement that will return out of the
_caller_ of the macro. Let's mark them as deprecated and instead
introduce some new macros that are more intuitive.
These new macros are less optimal when an
