Hi Sascha,
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 15:49, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 03:04:48PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > I guess a first step would be to limit the maximum resolution of vopl
> > to what the hardware can do. We would likely end up with 1080p by
> > default then for the
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 03:04:48PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:23:56AM +0900, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I'm trying this patch series with 6.1.x kernel. it works fine on rk356x
> > based boards (ROCK 3), but it has a problem on rk3399 boards (ROCK 4).
> >
>
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:23:56AM +0900, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm trying this patch series with 6.1.x kernel. it works fine on rk356x
> based boards (ROCK 3), but it has a problem on rk3399 boards (ROCK 4).
>
> on rk3399 with this patch, I can see large noise area (about one third
Hi,
On 2023-02-03 14:09, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:23:56AM +0900, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> I'm trying this patch series with 6.1.x kernel. it works fine on rk356x
>> based boards (ROCK 3), but it has a problem on rk3399 boards (ROCK 4).
>>
>> on rk3399 with
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:23:56AM +0900, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm trying this patch series with 6.1.x kernel. it works fine on rk356x
> based boards (ROCK 3), but it has a problem on rk3399 boards (ROCK 4).
>
> on rk3399 with this patch, I can see large noise area (about one
Heiko, Sandy,
Ok to apply these patches?
Sascha
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 02:22:10PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> It's been some time since I last sent this series. This version fixes
> a regression Dan Johansen reported. The reason turned out to be simple,
> I used the YUV420 register values
On Wednesday, 18 January 2023 14:22:10 CET Sascha Hauer wrote:
> It's been some time since I last sent this series. This version fixes
> a regression Dan Johansen reported. The reason turned out to be simple,
> I used the YUV420 register values instead of the RGB ones.
>
> I realized that we
Hi Sascha,
Thanks a lot for the v3, works great in my setup!
On 1/18/23 14:22, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> It's been some time since I last sent this series. This version fixes
> a regression Dan Johansen reported. The reason turned out to be simple,
> I used the YUV420 register values instead of the
Tested the whole series on my Rock 3A, with my 1440p monitor. Works wonders!
Thank you.
Tested-by: Dan Johansen
Den 18.01.2023 kl. 14.22 skrev Sascha Hauer:
It's been some time since I last sent this series. This version fixes
a regression Dan Johansen reported. The reason turned out to be
It's been some time since I last sent this series. This version fixes
a regression Dan Johansen reported. The reason turned out to be simple,
I used the YUV420 register values instead of the RGB ones.
I realized that we cannot achieve several modes offered by my monitor
as these require
10 matches
Mail list logo
