Re: [Dri-devel] little fix for install.sh

2002-05-16 Thread Sergey V. Udaltsov
Sergey, sorry for replying only now. For some time I was planning to apply That's OK. Everyone understands that actual work on the driver has incomparable higher priority. The problem is that the existence of those dri-old files are the only proof that anything was installed before. If we

Re: [Dri-devel] little fix for install.sh

2002-05-16 Thread José Fonseca
On 2002.05.15 22:34 Jan Schmidt wrote: quote who=Jos? Fonseca ... The problem is that the existence of those dri-old files are the only proof that anything was installed before. If we default to delete file when there is no backup then someone mistakenly trying to restore with no

Re: [Dri-devel] little fix for install.sh

2002-05-15 Thread José Fonseca
On 2002.05.14 00:14 Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: ... I found another little buggy in the install.sh script (in mach64 binary snapshots). This script moves existing binary objects (for example, mach64.o) into dri-old prefix and restores them back when asked. But if mach64.o had not not exist

Re: [Dri-devel] little fix for install.sh

2002-05-15 Thread Jan Schmidt
quote who=Jos? Fonseca On 2002.05.14 00:14 Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: ... I found another little buggy in the install.sh script (in mach64 binary snapshots). This script moves existing binary objects (for example, mach64.o) into dri-old prefix and restores them back when asked. But if

[Dri-devel] little fix for install.sh

2002-05-13 Thread Sergey V. Udaltsov
Hi all I know, this is going to sound stupid in the list discussing textures, mappings etc.. but I found another little buggy in the install.sh script (in mach64 binary snapshots). This script moves existing binary objects (for example, mach64.o) into dri-old prefix and restores them back when