Hi Timo,
Thank you for your answer, as it clears up the issue. Apparently I was
following a wrong trail. I was supposing that the “outflow” had been removed
because it was not working right, instead of not being general enough.
Since my oil-water program was crashing as soon as I put in the
On 07.02.19 16:56, Edscott Wilson wrote:
Hi Edscott,
Hello all,
I understand the the boundary type specification"outflow" has been
removed from the current version of DuMux.
that is correct. It was removed because the implementation wasn't
general enough. There is, to our knowledge, no
Hi Lorenzo,
"test_impes" (unmodified) doesn't use a parallel solver backend. You
need to use a parallel solver as Bernd said in a previous answer to your
post. The only parallel solver is currently the AMGBackend. There is
also a test called "test_impeswithamg". Please try that one in
Hi Gion,
it looks like "loadBalance()" was never called in the corner point grid
manager. This should be fixed now on master and release/3.0.
Can you check and verify (do a git pull origin releases/3.0, or git pull
origin master if you are on master)?
Best wishes
Timo
On 05.02.19
Hello all,
I understand the the boundary type specification"outflow" has been
removed from the current version of DuMux.
I see that an outflow is now to be specified by constructiong the
element solution, evaluating the gradient and calculating the flux. In an
example I see that the
