Hello all,
I am new to EJB. I am using Sun's J2ee implementation server, while
trying to deploy an entitiy bean, i am getting this following error.
java.rmo.ServerException : RemoteException occurred in server thread;
nested exception is:
java.rmi.RemoteException : Error processing ejb jar:
Hi all,
I have a very basic questionHow to get the reference of a stateful
session bean from a stateless session bean??
Manish
===
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message
Hi,
I am new to EJB/J2EE . Can anyone suggest an Application Server which comes
free.
Thanks
Anand
===
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For
Hi,
I am using the j2sdkee software development kit. I written some EJB
example. But these examples run on my computer very slowly. My computer
contains the 256MB RAM, 15GB Harddisk. But It is very slow. Does anybody
help me for this situation? What should I do? Is the solution to install
Hi,
I'm looking for low cost java based tools for remote monitoring j2ee
applications. probably a flexible (i.e. extensible) general purpose
monitoring framework would be a good start. are there any open source tools
available? it seems that most monitoring apps are written in c or perl. how
are
Hi,
You must run the j2ee command on the different dos command.
You follow the result of deployment on the dos command prompt where you run
the j2ee command. j2ee writes the reason of this deployment error.
Ferhat.
-Original Message-
From: Vishwa [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11
Hi,
Please add this mail Id in your mailing list.
Regards,
Chandrasekhar P.
===
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email
http://www.ejboss.org/
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/download.html
http://www.openmaster.com/ejb/
and
http://www.enhydra.org/cuts/enhydra/4.0-alpha0/EnterpriseReleaseNotes.html
-Original Message-
From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Title: Object Caching and Transaction Mgmt
Hi All,
I am developing a framework. In which Object Caching is one of its module. It would be great if anybody can share his experiences (good and bad :-)). Can anybody suggest a design pattern for TRansaction and Synchronization of Objects and
Hi,
You must run the j2ee command on the different dos command.
You follow the result of deployment on the dos command prompt where you run
the j2ee command. j2ee writes the reason of this deployment error.
Ferhat.
-Original Message-
From: Aravind Naidu [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Are there any suggested design patterns for queuing multiple requests to the same
Stateful Session Bean (in order to avoid the exception because Session Beans can only
handle one request at a time).
We are in an HTML - JSP - Java - EJB environment and the user is clicking more than
one button
Greetings, to join this list send mail to the address below, only
instead of signoff EJB_INTEREST
send subscribe EJB_INTEREST YOUR NAME
or
send help to learn more about the listserv
-Original Message-
From: Chandrasekhar PATARLAPALLI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 11,
===
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- Original Message -
From: Manish Bijay Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a very basic questionHow to get the reference of a stateful
session bean from a stateless session bean??
The same way you got the reference to the stateless session bean. Create an
InitialContext and perform a
Please follow these instructions to unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
Saurabh Khare
IBM UK
Hello, how do I call an EJB in a remote J2EE server from an EJB.
I have tried the following (the remote J2EE is at 192.168.1.1):
Context context = new InitialContext();
context.addToEnvironment("org.omg.CORBA.ORBInitialHost", "192.168.1.1");
context.addToEnvironment("java.naming.provider.url",
Title: FW: How to detect if a synchronization has taken place because the data has changed?
Please, read the original message carefully. You are not within a transaction. Transaction Isolation Level should not have anything to do with this problem. I know how I would solve this problem
Create a pool of stateless session bean references in your client. An
example pooling mechanism is in the Developer's Guide that you can get from
our web site. It it open source...
Regards,
-Chris.
-Original Message-
From: Graham Parsons [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May
I misread your requirements. I thought you were talking stateless.
In your case, you can simply mutex on the stateful session bean itself:
synchronized(aBean){
aBean.someMethod(); // ...
}
However this only works if the bean reference is stable. More than likely
though, you won't have this.
Andrzej,
Exactly! There is a bunch of this in the archives.
Regards,
-Chris.
-Original Message-
From: Andrzej Kobus [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: How to detect if a synchronization has taken place
because
A third alternative is to Not use Stateful beans, but use
http session state
for session state management, and use stateless beans for
your services
The limitation of serialized calls to EJB has been one of my
frustrations with EJB. This thread is the result.
There needs to be another
Another thought, is to use a appserver that allows reentrant
calls into a bean controlled in the DD. IAS supports this.
Does this not violate the specification ?
This posters problem would be non-existant. He'd just have to
design the business logic to tolerat reentrant calls into
the
Another thought, is to use a appserver that allows reentrant
calls into a bean controlled in the DD. IAS supports this.
Does this not violate the specification ?
Yes. My point. The spec needs more flexibity or another
service type defined. There's a _large_ number of commong problems
snip
Another thought, is to use a appserver that allows reentrant
calls into a bean controlled in the DD. IAS supports this.
Does this not violate the specification ?
Yes. My point. The spec needs more flexibity or another
service type defined. There's a _large_ number of
Proneel,
For what it is worth, we have have many customers using Verve and GemStone/J
together in just the manner you describe. Also one configuration of Verve
uses GemStone/J for its persistence engine.
Verve is really neat in that it is focused only on the process aspect of the
problem, and
What sort of interface do they provide?
Does it look like a CORBA service, or is it wrapped under a session bean?
Thanks,
Thor HW
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Raber" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: Workflow products
vendor
Just a quick note here, as I believe people are thinking that we have
somehow violated the EJB specification w.r.t. re-entrant calls to
stateful session beans: we have not.
We provide exactly the capabilities for stateful session beans as
defined in the EJB 1.1 specification: no more and
hi!
I have a question on the behavior of (non-primary-key) finders (e.g., findAll) for an
entity bean, using BMP. Typically, I want to retrieve just the primary keys of the
entity beans satisfying the finder condition. In my BMP code, I perform the SQL query
and return the primary keys as a
Whew!!! That is a relief. Thanks for that clarification.
For a moment from the previous poster's notes, I was under the impression
that IAS allowed re-entrancy to beans, which gulp!! poses a multitude of
problems.
-- Aravind
-Original Message-
From: A mailing list for Enterprise
The interface is CORBA based, but it is all wrapped in Java helper classes.
These Java wrappers make it feel like EJB. From a design stand point, you
deal with Homes/Remotes... the usual stuff.
-Chris.
-Original Message-
From: Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
This is a basic issue that comes up frequently. I'll restate some
obvious points and tell you what I feel is the best approach to handle
this.
A user of a browser expects, by convention, to be able to select a
links/buttons concurrently. Servlets/JSPs must deal with this in general
and in
31 matches
Mail list logo
