The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
807 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893
libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
571 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626
puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
421
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:00:17 -0600
Brian Stinson wrote:
> > So, we haven't been meeting too much lately with everyone traveling,
> > etc.
> >
> > Also, Starting in january, FESCo is going to be meeting on Fridays
> > at this slot. :)
> >
> > So, how about we pick another
There is a Package Review component in the Fedora EPEL product in bugzilla.
Should there be? I figured it was useful for EPEL only packages, but I've
also been told that even EPEL only reviews should go under the Fedora product.
The EPEL FAQ
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
197 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
180 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
174
> "DF" == Denis Fateyev writes:
DF> If we just could work "the same SRPMS name" problem around ;-)
DF> Healthy repos with the master branch orphaned [1] may look a little
DF> weird to users...
That is not abnormal for EPEL-only packages, though. The dead.package
file in
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
301 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
93 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-925e9374c9
python-pymongo-3.0.3-1.el7
64
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Orion Poplawski
wrote:
> On 12/30/2015 10:00 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 12/30/2015 12:16 AM, Denis Fateyev wrote:
> >> Actually, I've opened a bug against 'msgpack':
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290393
> ...
> >
>