> On 8/16/19 7:45 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
>
> It seems to be working for me - not sure what the "official" stance is.
Strange, it didn't seem to work here, for example:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1323057
___
epel-devel
On 8/16/19 12:16 AM, willi.feh...@t-online.de wrote:
Dear EPEL developers,
I would like to request a handful of packages for EPEL-8.
Name of the packages and short description and a reason why the package
is needed.
*Fail2Ban:*
Fail2Ban is an Intrusion Prevention Software which protects
On 8/16/19 7:45 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
Is automatic python dependency generation supposed to work on EPEL 8?
It seems to be working for me - not sure what the "official" stance is.
--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office
Is automatic python dependency generation supposed to work on EPEL 8?
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 02:17, willi.feh...@t-online.de
wrote:
>
> Dear EPEL developers,
>
>
>
> I would like to request a handful of packages for EPEL-8.
>
>
>
> Name of the packages and short description and a reason why the package is
> needed.
>
>
>
> Ansible:
> Ansible is required for
Alright, the --skip-nvr-check makes it work. I don't need --target,
although I have a package.cfg with it. It still gives a lot of error
messages but then proceeds to build:
Target epel8-playground is unknown. Skip.
Could not find the release/dist from branch name epel8-playground
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 7:18 AM Dave Dykstra wrote:
>
> So that did get the epel8-playground branch created for me, in this
> issue:
> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/15267
>
> I was able to successfully pull the branch, populate it, and push it
>
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 21:12, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Does it make sense for packages to wait in testing for two weeks when they
> are new packages?
>
Thanks for bringing this up. I was hoping to get this mentioned before
FLOCK etc but we have been snowed under in Fedora Infrastructure. I
would
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 12:17, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> What to do about missing gcc-objc from RHEL8? Are there alternative compilers
> yet that we can access? Will we have to package gcc-objc for EPEL8
> separately?
>
gcc-objc will need someone to make a module or SCL for it. The GCC
So that did get the epel8-playground branch created for me, in this
issue:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/15267
I was able to successfully pull the branch, populate it, and push it
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/singularity/tree/epel8-playground
I tried first
Dear EPEL developers,
I would like to request a handful of packages for EPEL-8.
Name of the packages and short description and a reason why the package is
needed.
Ansible:
Ansible is required for software provisioning and configuration management.
It's already available in EPEL-7 and it's
11 matches
Mail list logo
