[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2022-01-31 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6395a45cb3 perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1.el7 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4069001f10 miniupnpc-2.0-3.el7 The following builds

[EPEL-devel] Re: Revisiting policy for limited arch packages?

2022-01-31 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 06:48:21PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > The limited arch policy we had for epel7 had a number of problems. > > At first we just said 'rebuild the exact rhel version' and then we > > switched to 'add a 0 to

[EPEL-devel] epel8-playground branch retires - happening now

2022-01-31 Thread Troy Dawson
Hello, I am currently in the middle of retiring all of the epel8-playground branches. I apologize for not sending an email ahead of time. For informations sake, I am retiring them with fedpkg retire "epel8-playground decommissioned : https://pagure.io/epel/issue/ 136" Just so people know

[EPEL-devel] Re: Revisiting policy for limited arch packages?

2022-01-31 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > The limited arch policy we had for epel7 had a number of problems. > At first we just said 'rebuild the exact rhel version' and then we > switched to 'add a 0 to release so the rhel package always gets > installed in favor of it'. It

[EPEL-devel] Re: Revisiting policy for limited arch packages?

2022-01-31 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 09:35:27PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Hi all, > > I just filed https://pagure.io/epel/issue/152 to ask if we should > revisit the policy for > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-packaging/#limited_arch_packages > > This policy seems very similar