The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-10049c7b14
libbsd-0.11.7-2.el7
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0b26ab3924
xrdp-0.9.21-1.el7
The following builds have been
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-08012668ea
libbsd-0.11.7-2.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-aaf428feb8
xrdp-0.9.21-1.el8
The following builds have been
On Tue Dec 13, 2022 at 16:47 +0100, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote:
Hi Leon,
> I noticed that on a RHEL8 workstation the deprecated and removed package
> from EL8.0 - libssh2, does not get substituted by the package from epel:
>
> libssh2-1.8.0-8.module+el8.0.0+4084+cceb9f44.1.x86_64
> vs
>
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a0c828a573
xrdp-0.9.21-1.el9
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
apptainer-1.1.4-1.el9
farstream02-0.2.9-10.el9
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 09:56:40 -0800
Troy Dawson wrote:
> Packages do not automatically get transferred over from epel7 to a newer
> epel. People have to request them.
> Nobody has requested it for epel9.
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/
yeah, I know the process
Packages do not automatically get transferred over from epel7 to a newer
epel. People have to request them.
Nobody has requested it for epel9.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 9:15 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> isn't anybody already
Hi,
isn't anybody already working on getting claws-mail to EPEL-9? My
initial assessment shows that it shouldn't be difficult
- add libetpan and ytnef, they are the missing BRs, both build OK from
fedora spec, neither is in RHEL
- add claws-mail, with some little tweaks it can use its fedora spec
On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 10:47, Leon Fauster via epel-devel <
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I noticed that on a RHEL8 workstation the deprecated and removed package
> from EL8.0 - libssh2, does not get substituted by the package from epel:
>
>
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2022-12-14 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#topic aloha
I noticed that on a RHEL8 workstation the deprecated and removed package
from EL8.0 - libssh2, does not get substituted by the package from epel:
libssh2-1.8.0-8.module+el8.0.0+4084+cceb9f44.1.x86_64
vs
libssh2-1.9.0-5.el8.x86_64
only possible with
yum update libssh2
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 7:35 AM Vladimir Pachnik <
vladimir.pach...@gooddata.com> wrote:
> would anyone be able to take over the build of 'perl-Net-Domain-TLD'
package for EPEL9 as per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144550 ?
For those who are wondering, The fedora package builds
11 matches
Mail list logo
